Archive for October, 2024

J:  The Harris Gang!; K:  Stein . . . Or Trump/Kennedy/Gabbard/Vance . . . Or Stein? (October 28, 2024)

Posted in Elections, Presidency on October 28, 2024 by e-commentary.org

. . .

K          “Both are vile.”

J          “Both are vile.  That is a wash.”

. . .

K          “Both are evil.”

J          “Both are evil.  That is a wash.”

. . .

K          “Harris is unfit.  She had three and a half years on the junior varsity job to evince that she is fit.  She failed miserably.”

J          “Trump is unfit.  He had four years on the varsity job to evince that he is fit.  He failed miserably.  That is a wash.”

. . .

K          “You must find some irony in concluding that someone who did the job or at least was in the actual job for four years is unfit for the job.”

J          “He had a chance at center stage.  He proved himself unfit.”

. . .

K          “Trump was the Symptom of a staggering Problem who has metastasized into another Problem.  The election is between Systemic Problem versus Trump Problem.”

J          “The original Problem is less of a problem than the new Problem.”

. . . 

K          “The Harris Gang is just the fourth term of the O’Bama administration.  Every single major grifter and grafter in the Biden Administration has known for years that Joey is mentally unfit and yet they have engaged in a cover up much wider and more pernicious and of longer duration than anything even Tricky Dick ever did.  On some level, that is treasonous.  The third term has been a complete failure.  More than enough is enough.”

J          “That may be the better we can do.”

. . .

J          “Trump is a rabid supporter of genocide and torture.  The Harris Gang are rabid supporters of genocide and torture.  Kennedy reluctantly tolerates genocide and criticizes torture.  That is a wash.”

K          “Agree.  However, Stein is not a genocider or a torturer.  She is avowedly against genocide and torture.  There is that to weigh.  That cannot be washed away.”

. . .

K          “Trump should ask the American people if they are better off now than they were four years ago.  He would close the deal.  The 3 percent in the Ruling Class and the Parvenu PMC Caste who serve them obediently are doing swimmingly while the other 97 percent are drowning.”

J          “Were they better off four years ago than they were eight years ago?”

. . . 

K          “The Supreme Court’s decision regarding abortion was a godsend to the Democrats.  The Democratic apparatchiks are terrified that a woman’s right to an abortion might be enshrined into law.  That would take the Democrat’s primary marketing ploy off the table.  When the Supreme Court issued its decision, Biden did not say that he would propose legislation while he had both houses, he said he would introduce legislation in the next session when he knew or should have known that he would confront a divided legislature.  There are times when hypocrisy is immoral.”  

J          “I saw him make that comment.”

. . .

K          “Sure would be nice to be deciding between Stevenson and Eisenhower.”

J          “Sure would even be nice to be deciding between Nixon and Humphrey.”

. . .

J          “The final audited results are in.  The Harris Gang:  Evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil and evil.  Trump:  Evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil and evil.” 

K        “The final audited results are in.  Trump:  Evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil and evil.  The Harris Gang:  Evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil, evil and evil.”  

. . .

K          “The endorsement from the Cheney crime family moved me toward the Trump camp.  The endorsement from Johnnie Bolton pushed me into the Trump camp.  The endorsement from Anne Applebaum removed any scintilla of doubt.  The recent babbling of Robert Kagan took the question off the table.  The NYT’s endorsement of Harris was the icing on the cake.  They sealed the deal.  I do have all of them to thank.”

J          “I never said that it is not an ugly bed that everyone is rolling and romping around in.”

. . .

K          “I would vote for Stein because she understands the problems and provides the answers and thus is blocked at each and every opportunity from saving the country.  However, while Trump likely would win in a fair election, there are concerns that this one will be cooked again.  I may be forced to vote Trump / Kennedy / Gabbard / Vance to provide a counterpoise.  Yet when I get into the booth, I must pause and catch my breath and vote for Stein.”

J          “No question.  I will hold my nose and vote for the puppet herself.”  

. . .

J          “Sure is revolting.”

K          “Sure is.  I need to wash.”

. . .

[See “Torturers for Harris” by Shayana Kadidal in “The Nation” dated September 18, 2024.]

[See the e-commentary at Le Election: One First Street (November 2, 2020),  Suffer Clinton.  The Devil.  We know. (November 7, 2016), Better the crook we know than the crazy man we don’t?  Applying The Conservative Tie Breaker. (June 20, 2016), Cheney/Bush v. Trumpi:  Crime Families Battling On The Big Stage (August 22, 2022), Johnnie Bolton:  The Triumph Of the Chickenhawks And Neo-Cons.  Join Fellow Patriots For The “April 14 Rally” And The Memorial Day “March For America”.  Oh, And Happy April Fool’s Day! (April 2, 2018), Reinstate The Draft; Reduce The Demand For War (Somewhat). Oh, And Happy Veterans Day! (November 6, 2017), Murthy v. Missouri:  AMA v. AAPS; Flaccid Amendment v. First Amendment.  The Speakers’ Corner And The Public Square. (March 18, 2024) and “Supreme Court backs Biden administration in social media dispute with red states”  Biden 1; People 0.  Oh, And Happy Canada Day! (July 1, 2024).]

Bumper stickers of the week:

My vote cancels your vote

Vote?  Why?  Not?

Can we just admit we may have taken this ‘anyone can grow up to be President’ thing just a bit too far?

“How many more of these stinking, double-downer sideshows will we have to go through before we can get ourselves straight enough to put together some kind of national election that will give me and the at least 20 million people I tend to agree with a chance to vote FOR something, instead of always being faced with that old familiar choice between the lesser of two evils?”  Hunter S. Thompson, Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail ’72

Ninth Annual Noble Prize In Jurisprudence (October 21, 2024)

Posted in Noble Prize in Jurisprudence on October 21, 2024 by e-commentary.org

. . .

K          “A prize dedicated to acknowledging and celebrating the work of someone who or some organization that really knows something about jurisprudence and the impact of courts, judges, lawyers and police on the lives and livelihood of ordinary citizens.  Someone who lives the conviction that men and women should establish and respect some norms and standards that are promulgated clearly to all and enforced equally in favor of and against all.”

J          “Someone who advances the Rule of Law and stuff like that.”

K          “The recipient of the eighth annual Noble Prize In Jurisprudence . . . is Jonathan Turley whose work in support of free speech and the First Amendment is laudable and worthy of review and reflection.  His work ‘The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage’ is worth a read. He is often a lone voice courageously challenging the Narrative.”

. . .

[See the e-commentary at Eighth Annual Noble Prize In Jurisprudence (October 23, 2023), Seventh Annual Noble Prize In Jurisprudence (October 17, 2022), Sixth Annual Noble Prize In Jurisprudence (October 18, 2021), Fifth Annual Noble Prize In Jurisprudence (October 19, 2020), Fourth Annual Noble Prize In Jurisprudence (October 21, 2019), Third Annual Noble Prize In Jurisprudence (October 15, 2018), Second Annual Noble Prize In Jurisprudence (October 16, 2017), First Annual Noble Prize In Jurisprudence (October 17, 2016) and Award Deadlines (Livelines?) (July 25, 2016).]

Bumper stickers of the week:

Give civil rights and civil liberties a chance

Make Civil Liberties Great Again

Rediscover the Constitution

Ninth Annual Noble Prize In Eco-nomics (October 14, 2024)

Posted in Noble Prize in Eco-nomics on October 14, 2024 by e-commentary.org

. . .

K          “An award acknowledging and celebrating the work of someone on the planet who really knows something about eco-nomics.  Eco-nomics is about making and sharing; e-con-omics is about taking and stealing.”

J          “The Noble Prize in Eco-nomics is a delightful and playful replacement for the discredited and misnamed ‘Nobel’ Prize in Voodoo E-con-omics.  You get what you reward.  You need to reward what you want to get.  Who gets it this year?”

K          “The recipient of the ninth annual Noble Prize In Eco-nomics is . . . Jeffrey D. Sachs for his work on sustainable development and economic development and generally for challenging the Narrative.”

. . .

[See “How the Neocons Subverted Russia’s Financial Stabilization in the Early 1990s” by Jeffrey Sachs in “A True Shock? Economist Jeffrey Sachs Reveals Secret at Heart of U.S.-Russian Relations” by Jeffrey Sachs and Matt Taibbi, recipient of Eighth Annual Pushitzer Prize In Commentary For 2023 (May 8, 2023), in “Racket News” dated September 4, 2024.]

[See the e-commentary at Eighth Annual Noble Prize In Eco-nomics (October 16, 2023), Seventh Annual Noble Prize In Eco-nomics (October 10, 2022), Sixth Annual Noble Prize In Eco-nomics (October 11, 2021), Fifth Annual Noble Prize In Eco-nomics (October 12, 2020), Fourth Annual Noble Prize In Eco-nomics (October 14, 2019), Third Annual Noble Prize In Eco-nomics (October 8, 2018), Second Annual Noble Prize In Eco-nomics (October 9, 2017), First Annual Noble Prize In Eco-nomics (October 10, 2016), Announcing The First Annual Noble Prize In Eco-nomics (May 2, 2016), Award Deadlines (Livelines?) (July 25, 2016), From e-con-omics to eco-nomics? (August 1, 2011) and Skip the Nobel in Economics (October 6, 2009).]

Bumper sticker of the week:

Make eco-nomics great again

First Monday In October:  Dos-à-dos (October 7, 2024)

Posted in First Amendment, First Monday In October, Middle East, Supreme Court, War on October 7, 2024 by e-commentary.org

. . .

K          “The putative civil libertarians (Kagan, Sotomayor and Jackson) have taken off their masks and revealed themselves to be . . . authoritarians and totalitarians.  My new super hero is . . . Sam, the civil libertarian.  What a long strange trip this life is turning out to be.”

J          “They are still concerned with the public good.  The public good sometimes requires one to look at and to and for the good of the public generally.”

. . .

K          “One of my projects still in draft form compares the Trump appointees and the Biden appointees to the federal district courts and the federal appellate courts.  Establishing a metric is problematic and vexing.  At this time, however, the Trump appointees have done much more to protect civil liberties than the Biden appointees.  In the last two Presidential election cycles, I broke the tie for the Presidential candidates based on my concern that the Democrats need to hold the Senate to control the judiciary.  That has changed.”  

J          “Trump has appointed lawyers who are loyal and obedient foot soldiers to him.  That does not promote the public good.”

. . .

K          “The most pressing legal concern today is to return to protecting the natural rights that preexist the adoption of the Bill of Rights and were until recently protected by the Bill of Rights.”

J          “With reasonable restrictions.”

. . .

K          “The word ‘Lawfare’ is a portmanteau of ‘law’ and ‘warfare’.  Portmanteaus are usually clever; ‘Lawfare’ is not.  Weaponizing the judiciary will haunt the legal system for decades.  The spiritual mitochondria of good faith and fair dealing is being eviscerated by judges cooperating with prosecutors to get politicians and people.”

. .  .

[See the e-commentary at Murthy v. Missouri:  AMA v. AAPS; Flaccid Amendment v. First Amendment.  The Speakers’ Corner And The Public Square. (March 18, 2024) and “Supreme Court backs Biden administration in social media dispute with red states”  Biden 1; People 0.  Oh, And Happy Canada Day! (July 1, 2024) and graduation advice.]

Bumper stickers of the week:

“What a long strange trip it’s been.”  Grateful Dead

Make Lawfare Imprudent Again

From Jill Stein:

Today, October 7th 2024, marks one year since the Hamas attack on Israel that many consider to have sparked Israel’s US-backed genocidal campaign against Gaza that is now exploding into a regional war.  But history did not begin on October 7th, 2023.

To understand the current situation, we must look back at least as far as 1948 to the Nakba, the brutal mass expulsion of indigenous Palestinians from their homes by Zionist paramilitaries and the newly formed state of Israel.  While the world has been watching in horror for the past year as this genocidal rampage has cut short hundreds of thousands of innocent lives, that one year was preceded by generations of violence, occupation, displacement, dispossession, apartheid, and ethnic cleansing.

While we abhor violence, we must understand that settler colonialism, occupation, genocide, and all forms of oppression have always provoked resistance.  If we merely condemned violence “on all sides” without first acknowledging the underlying conditions of oppression and doing everything we can to rectify those conditions, we would not only fail to address the root causes of the problem, but would risk becoming complicit in injustice by drawing a false equivalency between oppressor and oppressed.  As Desmond Tutu observed, “if you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.”

One of history’s greatest nonviolent change makers, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., identified the “great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom” as “the white moderate who is more devoted to ‘order’ than to justice” and “who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice”.  For too long, the US government has supported Israel’s version of “order” and “peace” that demands the systematic subjugation of Palestinians to violent injustice.  But whenever people are denied their human rights, resistance is inevitable.  Even President Kennedy recognized this with his statement that “those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.”

Dr. King also recognized the hypocrisy and uselessness of condemning the violence of the oppressed without first addressing the violence of oppression: “I knew that I could never again raise my voice against the violence of the oppressed in the ghettos without having first spoken clearly to the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today – my own government.”  The US government is fully complicit in the violence that Israel has inflicted on the Palestinians and others, after supplying Israel with over one hundred fifty billion dollars in military aid and shielding Israel from accountability to the international community for its long history of defying international law.  For Americans to condemn Palestinian resistance while our own government actively oppresses the Palestinian people would be neither just nor conducive to peace.

The events of October 7th, 2023 have been weaponized to justify the genocide of Palestinians.  Yet it has become clear that official accounts of October 7th have not only been divorced from the historical context, but factually distorted to serve the agenda of the Zionist Israeli government.  As one example, Australia’s ABC News reported in September that Israeli forces apparently applied the “Hannibal Directive” on October 7th, killing an untold number of their own citizens in attempts to prevent them from being taken hostage.  The official discourse on hostages has also been extremely one-sided, rarely if ever mentioning that thousands of Palestinians are held prisoner by Israel without charge.  From the “Hannibal Directive” killings to Netanyahu’s disregard for the families of Israeli hostages to Israel’s expansion of the war far beyond Gaza, it’s clear that the Israeli government has not acted out of concern for hostages, but has only used those concerns as justification to launch a preconceived agenda of conquest and genocide.

In just the last few weeks, the situation has gotten even worse.  In a massive escalation of its genocidal war on Gaza, Israel has invaded Lebanon.  Shortly thereafter, Iran launched a barrage of missiles at Tel Aviv in response to Israel’s attacks on Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, Palestine, and Iran itself, raising fears of an ever-expanding war in the Middle East that could even spark World War III, nuclear war, or both.

If he wanted to, President Biden could stop this war with one phone call to the Israeli prime minister as Ronald Reagan did in 1982.  Israel’s war machine is completely dependent on US taxpayer-supplied weapons, money, military and diplomatic support.  But instead the Biden-Harris administration is complicit in Netanyahu’s plans to expand this horrific war.  A recent Politico article titled “US officials quietly backed Israel’s push against Hezbollah” revealed that top Biden advisors actually encouraged Israel to invade Lebanon – despite the Democrats’ claims that Kamala Harris is “working tirelessly for a ceasefire”.

We do not consent to be dragged into World War III by Netanyahu to support his genocidal land grab in Palestine, Lebanon, and beyond.  By allowing Netanyahu to essentially dictate US foreign policy, Biden and Harris have abdicated the responsibility of their office.

As President, the first thing I will do is make the phone call to stop this madness at once and fix the crisis at its source – by ceasing all support to Israel until it ends its genocide in Gaza and agrees to negotiate a settlement for Palestine and the region consistent with international law and the rulings of the International Court of Justice.  The US, as the primary backer of Netanyahu’s military campaigns, holds the power to end his assault on Gaza and bring him to account.  This is not a matter of diplomacy but of the US electorate exercising its responsibility by voting for leaders with the political will to act.  As voters in the most powerful nation on Earth, we bear a unique obligation to hold our government and its allies accountable.

By holding Israel accountable, the US can rejoin the international community, from which we have become increasingly isolated due to our government’s unconditional support for Israel’s defiance of international law.  When the United Nations considered membership for Palestine this year, 143 nations voted in favor and only 9 against, including the US and Israel.  But the US has consistently used its veto power to shield Israel from accountability, undermining any credibility our nation has to speak on issues of international law and human rights.

As a Jew who grew up just after the Holocaust, with relatives who fled pogroms and a grandfather named Israel, I take “never again” seriously.  And that means never again for anyone.  In just the last year, I have met thousands of people from all walks of life, including Muslims, Jews, Christians, Palestinians, Israelis, Arabs, and many others from many ethnic, religious and spiritual backgrounds.  And I can say with certainty from my personal experience that peace and friendship are possible.  We can put an end to war, genocide, and generations of oppression, and start a new path to a world of peace, justice, and human rights for all.

In solidarity and gratitude,

Jill Stein