A Deft Move (October 6, 2014)
. . .
L1 “They have one of the few jobs that allow one to decide what to do and what not to do. What to decide and what not to decide. When to decide and when not to decide. Why to decide and why not to decide. The big challenge is to decide who gets to decide.”
L2 “Ecclesiastes in practice. And it is a part-time job with full-time pay for life. Sign me up.”
. . .
L1 “By doing nothing, they did not do nothing, they did do something, although they did not do everything.”
L2 “That’s the thing I like about them. Sign me up.”
L1 “Not a bad compromise. The four regressive and reactionary corporatists on the right and the four progressive civil libertarians on the left were all jockeying for Kennedy’s nod. Kennedy supports the freedom to marry, yet there is that concern that he views the marriage thing as a state matter. So they agreed to dismiss all the petitions for cert. and allow the decisions below to stand and move forward.”
L2 “The issue can continue to percolate in the courts below and in the courts of public opinion around them. Sign me up.”
L1 “As I see it, the four male Republican Catholic Justices on the right squared off against the four ‘female’ Democratic ‘Jewish’ Justices on the left and all lobbied for the vote of the male Republican Catholic Justice.”
L2 “Hard not to entertain a lingering concern that it is another ‘Justice delayed is justice denied’ scenario. Justice is being delayed and denied for some to allow the bigger controversy to stew.”
L1 “A good compromise, really. They are all astute enough to realize that hundreds of thousands of citizens will be getting married in the interim providing more momentum for the freedom to marry. If one of the remaining three-judge federal Circuit Court panels elects to deny persons the right to marry, the plaintiffs will move for and receive en banc review by the entire Circuit Court that will almost surely side with those upholding equal protection and due process. Thus, a disagreement between or within the Circuit Courts that typically leads to Supreme Court review will never manifest itself.”
. . .
L1 “Marriage will be a fundamental right shortly. It is a matter of time.”
L2 “At times, we tell time. At other times, time tells time. Always good when time is on your side.”
L1 “Time marches on. Life goes on.”
. . .
[See the commentary at “The Sea Change Is Now A Tsunami (March 11, 2013)” and “The Tsunami Hits Shore (March 24, 2014)” and other commentary at https://e-commentary.org/category/gay-politics/.%5D
Bumper sticker of the week:
Sign outside the Supreme Court last year during oral argument: “Supremes: You can hurry love.”