e-commentary

. . .

K          “The ‘D’ Division of the ‘War and Wall Street Party’ nominated its candidates and concluded its confabulation last week.  The ‘R’ Division of the ‘War and Wall Street Party’ nominated its candidates and concluded its confabulation this week.”

J          “Both Divisions remain pro-war and anti-peace.”

K          “Both Divisions remain pro-Wall Street and anti-Main Street.”

. . .

J          “The sets looked like glitzy game shows with the gamesters playing games, selling snake oil and titillating the bases.”

K          “And the Democratic National Committee (DNC) did not even have the decency and integrity to invite Tulsi Gabbard to speak.  They may have lost the progressive vote.  It may be over.”

J          “Mark my words, the ‘War and Wall Street Party’ will win in November.  We need a viable second party.  The ‘Peace and Main Street Party’ is catchy, but will it catch on.”

. . .

[See the e-commentary at “The Choice:  Pro War And Pro-Wall Street Candidate v. Pro War And Pro-Wall Street Candidate (April 13, 2015)”, “The ‘War and Wall [Street] Party’ On The War Path (February 1, 2016)”, “The First Look At The ‘Second Political Party’ (January 3, 2011)” and “DNC:  ‘We’re Losers.  Vote for Us.’ (February 27, 2017)”.]

Bumper stickers of the week:

And the Democratic National Committee did not even have the decency to invite Tulsi Gabbard to speak

Great Meteor 2020  Just End It Already

MOFA  Make Orwell Fiction Again

This entry was posted on August 31, 2020 at 9:13 am and is filed under Book Reference, Political Parties, Wall Street, War, War and Wall Street Party. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.