Rating The Rating Agencies And The Courts That Should Berate Them: FFF (May 3, 2010)
. . .
NNN “The ratings agencies such as Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch knew or should have known that third parties would and did reasonably rely on their ratings.”
OOO “Exactly. They intended for third parties to rely on their ratings.”
NNN “Didn’t some court reach the preposterous conclusion that the ratings agencies are protected by the First Amendment?”
OOO “The free speech rights of the rating agencies are protected against government interference. The government did not interfere with their right to free speech. That ends the First Amendment inquiry. The ratings agencies are not immune from civil and criminal prosecution.”
NNN “But the court used the First Amendment to provide complete immunity for the rating agencies.”
OOO “Keep in mind that there are thousands and thousands of incompetent and marginally competent judges in America. And thousands of dishonest ones. The judge may have seen his stock portfolio decline and decided to take action. In the end, if the decision is patently incorrect, do not follow it. Disregard the decision as a perverse anomaly. Law books are littered with dishonest decisions.”
NNN “The ratings were patently false and fraudulent. The rating agencies intended for others to rely on the ratings. Ordinary citizens reasonably relied on the ratings. Ordinary citizens were damaged by the fraudulent ratings. So the only issues for an honest judge in a civil action are the amount of damages and the amount of punitive damages.”
OOO “Exactly. And the heads of the ratings agencies lied under oath before Congress. They were advised by their attorneys not to ‘tell the whole truth’ to Congress and they did not ‘tell the whole truth’ to Congress. That is perjury. Except in the land of perjury. Their attorneys suborned perjury. Combine perjury and obstruction of justice and conspiracy and RICO charges. The sentence for four felonies is much stiffer. A summer law clerk could handle the prosecution.”
NNN “The biggest question is also easily answered. There are no prosecutions because the ratings agencies and their friends on Wall Street own the government and the prosecutors.”
OOO “Talk about systemic failure.”
. . .
[See the “e-ssay” dated Jan. 14, 2008 titled “The ‘R’ Word, The ‘D’ Word or the ‘S’ Word?” on the rating agencies and the “e-ssay” dated May 2, 2005 titled “Ohio – Not Forgettin’ Ohio; The Battleground State Battles On.”]
Bumper stickers of the week:
Better to know the judge and the prosecutor than to know the law.
Spill, baby, spill.
This entry was posted on May 3, 2010 at 12:46 pm and is filed under Bailout/Bribe, Conflicts of Interest, Courts, Crime/Punishment, Perjury, Perjury/Dishonesty, Rating Agencies. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.