Archive for March, 2024

Airlines:  The 800 Lb. Sabre-tooth Tiger Stalks Us; The Reticulated Python Strangles Us (March 25, 2024)

Posted in Airlines, Collapse, Kleptocracy on March 25, 2024 by e-commentary.org

. . .

J          “Our gravest concern may be hoping and praying the planes stay in the air long enough to get us there.”

. . .

K          “Alaska Airlines would not refund the money directly and immediately.  They offered to refund it to some digital wallet to use for a later purchase.  A not insubstantial number of folks will not use the digital dollars . . . which rewards and benefits Alaska Airlines.  They did transfer the funds, but the funds did not transfer.  After an inquiry, I was told that I had to open the e-mail and transfer the funds myself to the wallet.  But the e-mail was written so that the spam filter would catch it and divert it.  And then when I retrieved it from spam, the time to transfer the funds had expired.  After a long telephone delay, I was able to secure another e-mail yet had to go to my spam file and transfer the digital dollars immediately to my wallet for a later purchase.  She responded that she does not make policy and . . . hopes I have a nice day.  She was sincere.  And handcuffed.  She is as much a victim.”   

. . .

J          “American Airlines requires one to pay a fee up front that is not refunded to preserve the right later to seek a refund to the original form of payment.  But at least the refund is made to the original form of payment.  For a substantial payment.  Two-hundred and twenty dollars, US ($220.00), for a local flight.”

. . .

K          “A year ago, Alaska airlines began charging for the exit row seats.  That is the norm in the industry.  For many decades, Alaska Airlines has otherwise treated me quite well and may be the best airline of the flock today.  And Alaska Airlines still believes that a mile is a mile is a mile is a mile in their frequent flier plan.”

J          “They need to treat their employees far better than they have recently.”

. . . 

J          “And what about Delta . . . .”

. . .

K          “And what about United . . . .”

J          “The President of United Airlines should be banned from riding in the United Airlines corporate jet and should instead should be required to fly the friendly skies of United.”

. . .

J          “And what about Frontier . . . .”

. . .

K          “And what about Southwest . . . .”

. . .

J          “Remember during Covid when the government gave tens of billions of dollars to the airlines to survive.  One airline executive defiantly stated to Congress that he would not let the government take an economic interest in the airline.  As long as the airline owns Congress, the airline can keep the government from obtaining an ownership interest in the airline.”

K          “And the money was used largely for stock buy backs that benefited the cabal.  And were once illegal.”

. . .

J          “And what about . . . .”

K          “They all behave criminally and abhorrently.”

. . .

        “When an airline charges for access to the bathroom on the plane, take note.  That may be a bridge too far.”

K         “Katie bar the door, as they say.  You know that possible revenue source is regularly discussed in the airline C-suite.”

J          “Before discussing stock buy backs.”

[See the e-commentary at “Recurring Revenue”:  Inserting A Tentacle Into Every Pocket (August 29, 2022), Stalking The Stalking Saber-toothed Tiger (June 12, 2023), Go Away Go Daddy (December 18, 2023), Volkswagen (VW).  The Bottom Half Of The German Engineering Class Must Go Somewhere.  Boeing? (July 1, 2019), Fraudulent Frequent Flying Fiascos.  Oh, And Happy Canada Day and Independence Day! (July 2, 2018), Going The Extra Mile: Today’s Airline Mileage Programs (August 19, 2013), China Invaded . . . And Won!  Oh Well. (January 29, 2024) and over nineteen years ago at An Airline (Partial) Survival Guide (January 24, 2005).]

Bumper stickers of the week:

Full refund to original form of payment:  $220.

All of our representatives are assisting other callers.

Murthy v. Missouri:  AMA v. AAPS; Flaccid Amendment v. First Amendment.  The Speakers’ Corner And The Public Square. (March 18, 2024)

Posted in Censorship, First Amendment, Journalism, Supreme Court on March 18, 2024 by e-commentary.org

. . .

J          “The American Medical Association (AMA) provides the soundest diagnosis and prescription.”

K          “The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) provides the soundest diagnosis and prescription.”

. . .

J          “In brief, the AMA encourages the dissemination of accurate information and enforces the censorship of misinformation and disinformation.”

K          “In brief, the AAPS promotes the First Amendment and protects free speech.”

. . .

[See the discussion “AMA? BITFD!” by Ben Hunt in “Epsilon Theory” dated November 24, 2020.  (“I thought I was immune to being shocked by corporate mendacity and greed.  Then I started digging into the AMA.”)  See “Technocensorship: When Corporations Serve As a Front for Government Censors” by John Whitehead, the recipient of the Second Annual Noble Prize In Jurisprudence (October 16, 2017), and Nisha Whitehead at The Rutherford Institute dated February 27, 2024.  Their amicus brief is more poetry than prosaic turgid legal prose.  (“The facts of this case are positively Orwellian.”]

[See the e-commentary at Graduation Advice:  Find The First Amendment (May 15, 2023).]

Bumper stickers of the week:

The Supreme Court hears oral argument in Murthy v. Missouri this morning.

Questions presented: (1) Whether respondents have Article III standing; (2) Whether the government’s challenged conduct transformed private social-media companies’ content-moderation decisions into state action and violated respondents’ First Amendment rights; and (3) Whether the terms and breadth of the preliminary injunction are proper.

The End Of Innocence:  March 13, 2020.  Oh, And Happy Coronavirus Day! (March 11, 2024)

Posted in Corruption, Covid / Coronavirus, Hypocrisy on March 11, 2024 by e-commentary.org

. . .

K          “The second Wednesday of the month started out like any other second Wednesday of the month.  Although there was a haunting and menacing threat percolating among the populace.  One e-mail noted that the meeting is at a new time this week.  One e-mail noted that the meeting is at a new place this month.  One e-mail noted that the meeting is at the same bat time and the same bat place this month.  One e-mail noted that the meeting features a new speaker promoting a book this month.  I took note of the notices.”

J          “I do remember.  And by Thursday, March 12, the e-mails came flying in during the day.  ‘Rescheduled.’  ‘Delayed.’  ‘Postponed.’  ‘Cancelled.’  Your life is changed.”

K          “And by Friday the 13th, everyone got religion.  And a National Emergency to boot.”  

. . .

K          “By the end of January, 2020, I bought and distributed two dozen pulse oximeters to folks who had no idea what they were and no idea what to do with them.  ‘What’s this?’  By middle February and as part of my ongoing research, I breezed through the stores to check inventory and discovered restocked shelves.”

J          “In February, 2020, I don’t recall anyone else who was considering future broken supply chains.”

. . .

K          “When her seven year old son was under the weather at 4 in the morning, she remembered something about that pulse oximeter thing device and . . . recalled the identity of the donor, as I recall.”

. . .

K          “Four years of real ugliness.”

J          “Unreal ugliness.”

. . .

[See “Four Years Ago This Week, Freedom Was Torched” By Jeffrey Tucker in the “Brownstone Institute” dated March 10, 2024.]

[See the more than sixty e-commentaries at Covid / Coronavirus and On Friendship Today:  Flat, Fried, Frayed, Frazzled, Frozen, Fractured, Fissured, Fatigued, Finished?  Oh, And Happy Thanksgiving! (November 20, 2023).]

Bumper stickers of the week:

“Wish I didn’t know now what I didn’t know then.”  Bob Seger, “Against the Wind”  (Someone suggested that Bob Seger regretted the syntax.  He crafted a perfect poem.  Not a word too many; not a word too few.  The two contractions are critical.  Wish I’d written it then; what I can do is quote it now.) 

What was the breaking news story of 2020?

2020 Submission for Pulitzer in “Breaking News Reporting”:

Short summary:

From an early expression of uncertain concern on January 27, e-commentary presented at least 30 weekly pieces with links analyzing, questioning, challenging, reflecting and opining on the Virus.  See “Covid / Coronavirus” on site.

Background Information:

Please identify any partnerships with other institutions or organizations in the reporting of this story:  There were and are no partnerships with other institutions or organizations.

Describe the event that triggered the coverage, and provide a timeline of how your publication broke key aspects of the story:

An aside from a public health official at a funeral on MLK Day; a few other stray observations by others; an intriguing and disconcerting article in late January.  Snippets, comments, rumors.  Something unknown yet virulent was spreading in America and the world.  What was up?

Throughout 2020, “J” and “K” gathered to discuss, analyze, question and challenge the unfolding events and responses.  Over the year, about 30 “e-commentary” pieces sought to make sense of every aspect of the new Big C.  Not enough space is available even to list merely the titles of the columns, yet all of the columns can be accessed under the “Covid / Coronavirus” Category. 

The February 24 piece was written by an author who was already wearing a mask in public and observed that business as usual would not be business as usual again.

The March and April pieces challenged the early government assertion that masks were not necessary and provided scientific authority that they are indeed effective; offered evidence that the Virus spread more widely by aerosolization and provided scientific sources; analyzed the failure to investigate in good faith available treatments; questioned the logic and wisdom of misrepresenting facts that would soon be challenged as unfounded or inaccurate; and raised other concerns and issues.  The March 16 and April 20 and 27 pieces round out the early breaking reporting.

The other topics ranged from questions and comments about masking, washing, distancing, testing, tracing, treating, vaccinating, working, playing, living, closing (schools), opening (colleges), moving (from the city to the country), losing (track of days and time) and not losing (one’s good sense and judgment).  The first submission is the final piece of the year providing the “Year In Review” and discusses the previous “e-commentary” and then the other six submissions on the new Big C are provided.

[How can you honestly mediate who broke a story first?]

What obstacles, if any, were overcome in the reporting?:

The primary obstacles were personal and psychological.  The obstacles were also the challenge and opportunity.  Few events in 2020 were 20/20.  Trying to discern the truth among all the untruths was trying.  So much of the purported information was incomplete, inadequate or inaccurate.  One had to remain extremely skeptical while endeavoring to remain open enough to discern a nascent kernel of truth amid the fog.  This writer did not lose sight of the intentions and ambitions of the “e-commentary” undertaking. 

The goals of “e-commentary” are to peak behind the curtain, lift up the carpet and look under the table while honing skills, helping folks and having fun.  The pieces ventured answers to questions that had not yet been asked, sought to elucidate as much Truth on as many issues in as few words as possible, and strove to leave a “commentary of record” for Clio’s consideration.  The permanent weekly written record struggling to make sense of what was at times senseless may be the enduring legacy.  

Please describe any innovative techniques used in reporting or telling the story:

The innovative techniques are often admittedly daunting to new readers.  Each week, the engaged reader joins the ongoing conversation between our friends “J” and “K” in their quest for Truth.  The presentations are sketched with plain white chalk on a stark electronic blackboard devoid of any other distractions of any kind.  After the discussion between the two of them, the site references and links articles, tracts, websites, scientific treatises and other sources for background and perspective.  Relevant prior “e-commentary” is also referenced and linked.  The playful signature sign off “Bumper sticker of the week” each week could be and is just about anything.  Edgy at times, this e-ndeavor intends not to be over the edge but rather occasionally to meander near there.

If applicable, how is this work distinguished from competing reporting on this subject?

“e-commentary” tells the story by not telling the story.  Too many pieces tell, direct, demand, promote and order the reader what to think, whereas these pieces coax, suggest, reveal, infer and intimate how one should consider thinking about the issues.  Experimental, adventurous, ambitious, and courageous, the dialogue format allows the reader to eavesdrop with permission on the ongoing conversation between “J” and “K” each week.  The conversation develops and builds on earlier comments and foreshadows later discussions enriching and rewarding the reader who is paying attention and following the ever emerging story line.

Please note any substantive challenges to the accuracy or fairness of the work and provide any response by the news organization or reporters:

There was no challenge to the accuracy or fairness of the commentary or any allegation of an ethical violation.  However, the crystal ball was on the fritz and in the shop a few times over the last sixteen (16) years.  The Euro (€) did not percolate up to an exchange rate of two dollars ($) as speculated, some election outcomes were a surprise but not a complete shock, etc.  But that comes with the terrain.

Uploaded Contents:

e-commentary: 17 Years Of Fun And Counting. Almost 800! (December 28, 2020)

Covid-19 Pandemic: Coming To A Town Near You (March 2, 2020)

Covid-19 PanICdemic: It’s (Been) Here. It’s The Aerosol That Kills! (March 9, 2020)

Covid-19 PanICdemic: ‘Virus Trumpius’ Is Virulent And Traumatic (March 23, 2020)

Covid-19 PanICdemic/Plague: The (Partial) Solution: Mom’s Chicken Noodle Soup Savored Alone (And Wash ‘N’ Wear ‘N’ Hide!) (Mar

Covid-19 PanICdemic/Plague: The Plague Of Lies Is Pandemic; Everyone In The Know Knows; Does Trumpi Know Something? (April 6,

Covid-19 PanICdemic/Plague: An Exclusive Interview With . . . Mr. COVID-19. Save The United States Postal Service (April 13, 2

If you will be including supplemental material, please summarize it:

Seven submissions are not enough to capture the scope and breadth and depth of this undertaking.  As part of the selection process, consider a second stage review by reading seven more randomly selected pieces from each of the top ten submissions.  According to the statistics maintained by WordPress, only a few hundred individuals have clicked on, but not necessarily even reviewed, the almost eight hundred “e-commentaries” published in the last sixteen (16) years.  That dismal public response may be enough reason to skip reading even the seven submissions.  There is, however, something there.  There is enough there.  There is more than enough there.         

_______________________

“Well those drifters days are past me now.  I’ve got so much more to think about.
Deadlines and commitments.  What to leave in, what to leave out.”  Bob Seger, “Against the Wind”

Supreme Court:  K:  “Right!”  J:  “Wrong!” (March 4, 2024)

Posted in Constitution, Law, Supreme Court, Trumpi on March 4, 2024 by e-commentary.org

. . .

J          “Wrong.  Period.”

K          “Right.  Full Stop.”

. . .

K          “The Constitution says ‘We the People of the United States’ not ‘I a sniveling petty night traffic court judge in a backwater jurisdiction of the United States who despises Trumpi and will do anything and everything to defeat him’.  Every person is entitled to due process and a fair and objective hearing in the proper jurisdiction applying applicable law.”

J          “We live in a federalist system that allows and requires the states to act at the right time and in the right circumstance.  The state of Colorado acting through its judicial branch acted properly and commendably.” 

. . .

K          “If there were three more of what I refer to as ‘individualist’ judges – although that term is now incomplete and inadequate – the decision likely would have been 12 – 0.”

J          “Time to appoint non-lawyers to the Court.”

. . .

K          “Was it really a 5 – 4 decision?  When I awake at 0400 hours, I will parse the decision a few more times.  Did Roberts, Thomas, Gorsuch, Alito and Kavanaugh affirmatively rule that Congress has the sole power to enforce the ‘Insurrection’ provision?”

J          “Another thing to worry about at four a.m.  That may be the ‘take home message’ and consequence.”

. . .

K          “The country is coming apart.  The world is ready to explode.  We may not see opening day of grayling season.  The decision has the added virtue of being profoundly restrained and responsible.”

J          “The person dividing the country is now free to continue dividing the country.  He is unrestrained and irresponsible.”   

. . .

K          “I will never again be able to condemn the Supreme Court unconditionally.”   

J          “I dissent.  I am currently and will remain disgusted by their abdication.”

. . .

J          “You’re not getting weak on me?”

K          “Still despise him.  When he emerged, Trumpi was really the ‘symptom’ not the ‘Big Problem’ in the country.  However, now he has metastasized into another ‘Problem’ that plagues the country.”

. . .

[See the e-commentary at Weaponizing The Judiciary: Democratic Prosecutors + Democratic Judges; Republican Prosecutors + Republican Judges:  Bad Math, Very Bad Math (December 4, 2023).  See the two discussions on J6 at January 6:  The Country Needs An Impartial And Objective Inquiry (January 8, 2024) and three years earlier at  On Riots And Rampages (January 11, 2021).]

Bumper stickers of the week:

“Law” and “War” are almost anagrams and read together (Lawwar) are almost palindromes.  

Lawfare = Law + (war)fare.  Very bad idea