Archive for the Courts Category

The Shot Heard Round The U.S. Of A.  Oh, And Happy Saint Nicholas Day! (December 9, 2024)

Posted in Civil War, Class, Courts, Ethics, Health Care, Judges, Morality, PMC on December 9, 2024 by e-commentary.org

. . .

K          “Takes one back to that timeless question in the first year philosophy class.  If a killer has in the past and continues now to issue and execute death warrants against your grandchildren and the legal and political system block and preclude each and every possible means of resistance or redress, are you morally obligated to dispatch the killer?”

J          “I agree with the verdict of the Internet.”

. . .

K          “I have never seen one issue so unite peoples of all races, colors, creeds, classes and backgrounds so quickly.  Every caste except the Ruling Class and their Parvenu PMC errand boys and girls are united.”

J          “People have been using the word ‘mandate’ recently.  This incident elicited the most resounding mandate in recent years.”

. . .

J          “A member of the Silent Majority appears to have used a silencer to silence corporate violence.”

K          “They say it only takes one butterfly.”

. . . 

J          “If a presidential candidate campaigned on a promise to deport all health insurance company executives on the afternoon of January 20, she or he would garner 250,000,000 votes.”

K          “In many Native cultures, the sociopaths and the psychopaths are readily identified and banished from the group/tribe/clan.  Banishing them is a more tidy way of dispatching a killer.”

J          “That would work, but how would it work?”

. . .

K          “I presented my appeal to a state court judge with an IQ of 105 dripping wet while standing on his tip toes who seemed to be imposing some type of perverse Chevron deference when he said that a private insurance company exists to tell the public when they should be reimbursed for their necessary medical care.  The appellate court used arrogance to hide their ignorance and were hostile when they were not indifferent. The courts have failed. There is no recourse.”

J          “And the judge surely has health care coverage with $25 deductible and is able to remind the insurance adjuster that he or she is a judge and expects the claim to be reimbursed in full.”

K          “Yup.  The judges are part of the problem not part of the solution.  One of the adjusters for BC/BS blurted out on the recorded line that she could get fired immediately for saying to me that they are directed to deny all claims and then force the patient to fight back.”

J          “You should have said that you are a judge.  You have the skills and the talent and the acumen for a judge; most judges do not.”

. . .  

K          “Are the folks with the pitch forks finally uniting with the people with the burning torches?”

. . .

[See “Murder and Social Murder: The Case of UnitedHealth CEO Brian Thompson” by Yves Smith, the recipient of the Seventh Annual Pushitzer Prize In Commentary For 2022 (May 9, 2022), in “www.NakedCapitalism.com” dated December 5, 2024.]

[See the e-commentary at Fight Or Flight In The Face Of Fear? A Principled Reaction To Stand (November 30, 2020) and “If I Get Diagnosed With Stage 4 Cancer . . . .” (December 13, 2021).]

Bumper stickers of the week:

“Those who make peaceful revolution [resolution] impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.”  John F. Kennedy (Ted could have polished/improved/balanced/cadenced the statement by saying “peaceful resolution” rather than “peaceful revolution”.)

“Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have the exact measure of the injustice and wrong which will be imposed on them.”  Frederick Douglass

“Power concedes nothing without a demand.  It never did.  It never will.”  Frederick Douglass

“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking:  What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family?  Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?  …  The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!  If … if … We didn’t love freedom enough.  And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation … We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”  Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago 1918 – 1956

“The most terrifying force of death comes from the hands of Men who wanted to be left alone.  They try, so very hard, to mind their own business and provide for themselves and those they love.  They resist every impulse to fight back, knowing the forced and permanent change of life that will come from it.  They know that the moment they fight back, their lives as they have lived them are over.  The moment the Men who wanted to be left alone are forced to fight back, it is a form of suicide.  They are literally killing off who they used to be.  Which is why, when forced to take up violence, these Men who wanted to be left alone fight with unholy vengeance against those who murdered their former lives.  They fight with raw hate and a drive that cannot be fathomed by those who are merely play-acting at politics and terror.  True terror will arrive at these people’s door, and they will cry, scream, and beg for mercy… but it will fall upon the deaf ears of the Men who just wanted to be left alone.”  Author Unknown

“I’m starting to think the ppl that got more upset about Oct 7 than the preceding oppression/subsequent genocide of Palestinians, & the ppl who are more upset by the murder of a healthcare CEO than the systematic killing of 10,000s of ppl via denial of healthcare, are the same ppl.”  Rohan Grey

The Ninth Circuit, The Eighth Amendment And The Hopeless (April 22, 2024)

Posted in Courts, Homelessness, Housing on April 22, 2024 by e-commentary.org

. . .

K          “For two score years, I have followed the Ninth Circuit as closely as some friends follow Major League Baseball or the price of Bitcoin.  The first guiding principle is clear:  The Niners exult sexy and surreal culture war issues while disregarding the cases and concerns of ordinary citizens.”

. . .

K          “The court’s job is to review legislation to ascertain whether it is unconstitutional. A court using a Constitutional Amendment to legislate on questions of public policy is beyond the jurisdiction of the court.” 

. . .

J          “Talk to a woman in any city who is approached by increasingly aggressive homeless citizens.  The treat presented almost always by men against woman from birth is unrelenting.  For a woman or other possibly vulnerable person finding a parking spot in the winter at night near a store is often a twenty-minute search.  A second-tier of parking spaces beside the handicapped parking spaces may be necessary.” 

K          “There is a disquieting tableau of individuals wandering around aimlessly all night with an old blanket as a bed roll and no place to unroll it.”

J          “I hear you.  I see it.  Everywhere.  All the time.”

. . .

K          “They allege that a rising tide lifts all boats.  For tens and tens and twenties of millions of Americans who are boatless, a rising tide only drowns them.”

J          “If they had a houseboat, they have been foreclosed from it.  If they had a life raft, they have been evicted out of it.  This situation hits close to home.  Even living modestly requires swift and steady paddling.  I looked at the credit card statements and the bank statements for just one month and wondered how anyone can afford to stay off the streets.”

. . .     

J          “A little mental health counseling might help.”

K          “Or a lot.”

. . .

K          “I have cataloged the cases brought for persons who can be considered ‘individual homeless persons’ or ‘helpless villagers’ in our society.  The Ninth Circuit treats a case brought by an ‘individual homeless person’ with indifference or disdain.  There is no publicity or acclaim in it.”

. . .

K          “One final decision looked like some hen doodles and fundamentally confused ‘personal jurisdiction’ with ‘subject matter jurisdiction’ in a simple case.  Three judges and twelve law clerks from profitable law schools did not get it.  The explanation is simple.  They did not have any interest or incentive to get it right.  An above average first year law student at a fifth-tier law school would discern that there is some difference.”

J          “I recall that one.  Time to appoint non-lawyers to the courts.  Lawyers are not capable of handling the task.  A new team is our only salvation.”

. . .

J          “Another failed institution?”

K          “They do not fail to disappoint.  The two-tiered review is an essential element of their institutional DNA and explains decades of dubious decisions.”

. . .

K          “The Niners are all about show biz and public relations.  Smoke and mirrors.  Shuck and jive.  They should move their headquarters to Hollywood.  They really are a profound disappointment.”

J          “And then you have the current Fifth Circus Court in NOLA.  I’ll take the Niners any day.”

. . .       

[See the e-commentary at The Ninth Circuit:  Two-Tiered “Just-Us” Review (February 13, 2017) and Revisiting “Does Any Institution In America Function? Oh, And Happy Friday The 13th! (December 9, 2019)” Four Years Later (December 11, 2023).]

Bumper stickers of the week:

Does the enforcement of generally applicable laws regulating camping on public property constitute ‘cruel and unusual punishment’ prohibited by the Eighth Amendment?

We live in a country with many, many, many rules and many, many, many laws, but we do not live in a country that believes in or adheres to the rule of law.

There is no law.  There is only ideology.

Revisiting “Does Any Institution In America Function? Oh, And Happy Friday The 13th! (December 9, 2019)” Four Years Later (December 11, 2023)

Posted in Academia, Civil Rights/Civil Liberties, Congress, Courts, Federal Reserve, Journalism on December 11, 2023 by e-commentary.org

. . .

J          “In the last four years?  Too many institutions are failing with each passing year.”

K          “Since our last discussion, the American Civil Liberties Union has gone off the rails and opted to fail.  Yet they have maintained their defense of some civil liberties.”

. . .

K          “The courts are increasingly militarized and weaponized war zones.  The major political crime families prosecute and persecute their opponents in the name of ‘Le Law’ before hand-picked and cooperative judges.”

J          “It depends on the court.  Count me a fan of the recent Colorado Supreme Court decision.”

. . .

J          “I agree the Federal Reserve is failing faster and may now have undermined all credibility and lost control of the economy.  That frank recognition does not inspire confidence.”

K          “End the Fed, they said.  Mend the Fed, I said.  End the Fed, I recently said.”

J          “A lawyer is heading the Fed.  I am uncomfortable with a lawyer heading the Fed.  I am also uncomfortable with a lawyer heading the Department of Just-Us.  And I am uncomfortable with an economist heading the Fed.  An English major should head the Fed.  Calculated obfuscation and willful misdirection should be eschewed and verboten, I say.” 

. . .

J          “You still nurturing your cavil with the MSM.”

K          “Still deeply troubled by the wholesale lack of integrity and independence.”

. . .

K          “For decades, I gave Academia a pass.  Academia has earned a failing grade.  I noted to someone recently that Harvard is ‘half a hedge fund and half a hustle’.  Think Eric Hoffer.  Are they going to refer to it as the Harvard Zuckerberg College of Arts and Sciences or the Harvard Gates College of Art and Sciences.  To distinguish their graduates.  Or warn others.”

J          “All of the profitable universities adhere to the same business plan.  There is not much difference.  Massive bloated bureaucracies of useless administrators pursuing petty grievances and protecting patches of turf rather than developing and analyzing doctrines, notions, ideas, hypothesis, and tentative conclusions and challenging others to do the same.  Some of the mascots are clever.”

. . . 

[See the e-commentary at Fourth Annual Noble Prize In Jurisprudence (October 21, 2019) awarding the Noble Prize in Jurisprudence to the ACLU.  See the discussion of the ACLU’s failure in the face of a fundamental challenge to civil liberties in Korematsu Two; And The ACLU Endorses It! (September 6, 2021).  The state of journalism is discussed at Read, But Don’t Read (June 26, 2023), Is Tucker Carlson The Walter Cronkite Of Our Day? (July 17, 2023), 2024 Pulitzer In “Breaking News Reporting” And “Investigative Reporting News”:  Jeff Gerth And The Columbia Journalism Review / Kyle Pope (March 13, 2023) and Eighth Annual Pushitzer Prize In Commentary For 2023 (May 8, 2023).  The courts  are discussed at Weaponizing The Judiciary: Democratic Prosecutors + Democratic Judges; Republican Prosecutors + Republican Judges:  Bad Math, Very Bad Math (December 4, 2023) and The Government Stumbles; The Judicial Legislature Rumbles (October 2, 2023).  Academia was discussed years ago at “Adjunktification” In The S.I.C. (Schooling Industrial Complex) (March 13, 2017) and The “Intellectual Infrastructure Investment Act” (“III”)  Oh, And Happy Valentine’s Day! (February 11, 2019).E-con-omists and e-cono-omics are discussed at Wandering E-con-omists:  The Travels And Travails Of E-con-omic Sciences (November 4, 2019).]

Bumper stickers of the week:

“We now live in a nation where doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, governments destroy freedom, the press destroys information, religion destroys morals, and our banks destroy our economy.”  Chris Hedges

“Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket.”  Eric Hoffer

DNC = RNC = WWP

(Refined) Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure (R FRCP) (August 8, 2022)

Posted in Courts, Law, Rule of Law on August 8, 2022 by e-commentary.org

. . .

K          “One federal judge held up a pen and stated that he affixes his signature to more motions and stipulations for extensions of time than to any other pleading.  Every deadline is absurdly short in practice.  The legal beagles in power should double all deadlines in the rules with one pen stroke.  Even the time to notice an appeal should be doubled.  A party oftentimes needs a longer period of time to accept intellectually and emotionally the consequences of a decision and the challenges of taking an appeal.  60 days instead of 30 to take an appeal.”

J          “That is the problem.  The deadlines are short to benefit the judges not the public.  Judges and lawyers do not take reasonable action without tremendous public pressure.”

. . .        

J          “A judge who orders that you give up a long planned vacation on short notice to generate a draft order and do his work and then dawdles for six months before guessing which way to go is not a sage jurist or a good person.”

K          “Standard operating procedure (sop) in the court system.  Judges view themselves as gods rather than public servants.  Something must change.  Rule changes will not solve everything without a change in behavior.”

. . .

Bumper stickers of the week:

If you cannot fully explain why you believe what you believe, you might be brainwashed.

Society has become so fraudulent that the truth actually bothers people.

“In the Fall an old man’s fancy lightly turns to thoughts of reforming the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”  With a nod to Al

Cosby And Equality (July 12, 2021)

Posted in Courts, Judges, Race on July 12, 2021 by e-commentary.org

. . .

K          “We are reaching a place of racial equality in America.  Rich Black criminals are now getting treated like rich White criminals.  And getting off.”

J          “And some folks say that society does not progress.”

. . .

K          “Poor Black and Brown criminals are treated worse than poor White criminals, but all three cohorts are treated very poorly.”

J          “The poor are treated poorly.  The rich are treated richly.  By definition, the poor cannot be treated richly.”

. . .

J          “Someone may have had something on one of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justices and called in the favor or agreed to remain silent.  Cosby pays a million for the briefing and the gibberish and the song and the dance, the lawyer calls in the favor for the well–healed client.”

K          “Or one of the lawyers was on the same junior varsity lacrosse team at prep school with one of the Justices.  The favor is subtle and not actionable.  Few of you members of the public know that judges are not held to ethical standards unless they do something really, really stupid and embarrassing.  That is then called unethical.”

. . .

K          “If the resources that went into putting a guilty man on the street had been spent examining the convictions of a dozen random cases of unconnected defendants, a few innocent men likely would have been released.”

J        “Is that why the words ‘perverse’ and ‘travesty’ and ‘injustice’ are in the dictionary?”

. . .

[See the e-commentary at “Equality On The Bench Today (August 21, 2017)”.]

Bumper stickers of the week:

Liberty and justice for some

The Civil Code exists to allow the rich to extract wealth from the poor; the Penal Code exists to prevent the poor from retaliating.

Lawyers And Clients: Peas In Pods; Hands In Gloves (March 22, 2021)

Posted in Courts, Judges, Law, Perjury, Perjury/Dishonesty on March 22, 2021 by e-commentary.org

. . .

K          “You tell me the name of a person’s lawyer and I will tell you about the person. The Rho is .97.

J          “You tell me the name of the person and I will tell you about the person’s lawyer. The Rho is .97.

. . .

J          “97 percent of all persons have no moral compunctions about lying or their lawyer lying on their behalf.  What does that say about lawyers?”

K          “What does that say about 97 percent of all persons?”

. . .

K          “Pea in pod.”

J          “Hand in glove.”

. . .

[See the conversation more than eight years ago between the “Lawyer” and the “Client” in the e-commentary at “Assigning Blame: The Lawyers: 50 Percent; The Non-Lawyer Public: 50 Percent; The Judges: 100 Percent (December 3, 2012)” and the e-commentary more than fifteen years ago on perjury – the backbone of the American legal system – at “Perjury, The American Way (February 20, 2006)”.]

Bumper sticker of the week:

Where are the judges?

The “Intellectual Infrastructure Investment Act” (“III”)  Oh, And Happy Valentine’s Day! (February 11, 2019)

Posted in Courts, Economics, Education, Law, Law School, Schooling, Schooling Industrial Complex on February 11, 2019 by e-commentary.org

. . .

K          “Who is doing the thinking in America?”

J          “Who is even thinking about who is doing the thinking in America?”

K          “Troubling, when you think about it.”

J          “America has the chattering class and the blabbering class and the blogging class and the twittering twit class, but not really a thinking class.”

. . .

K          “We can draw on the bipartisan enthusiasm for infrastructure.  Think about the ‘Intellectual Infrastructure Investment Act’ (‘III’) or the Triple ‘I’ as it is known in the vernacular.”

J          “Would you first establish and endow a great School of Economics or a great School of Law?  Thought must be given to establishing and endowing a great School of Foreign Policy and not long after that a great School of Journalism.”

K          “We need greatness.  We may have to settle for goodness.  We may have to settle for okayness.  We may have to settle for notcrappyness.  Some institutions need to respond to that must elusive thing in recent American experience:  Competition.  Competition with the Schooling Industrial Complex (‘SIC’).”

J          “But we really need to put the SIC out of business.”

. . .

K          “In a delightful irony, the SIC will fund the new paradigm.  A billion dollar judgment in the CTJ against Harvard Law School for damages from Pompeo’s criminal activity and a billion dollar judgment in the CTJ against Yale Law School for damages from Bolton’s criminal activity provide enough seed money to fund the undertaking.  If necessary, the judgments can be satisfied from the assets of the respective parent corporations.  Just transfer the assets digitally.”

J          “Brilliant.  Shift resources from ‘Schooling’ to ‘Education’ without any government dollars.  The project also should aspire to take the ‘A’ out of the MICAC and to substitute a real ‘A’ for clear thinking.  Let’s get going.”

. . .

[See the e-commentary at “Suing Law Schools; Suing Gun Makers.  Oh, And Happy Law Day! (April 30, 2018)”, “Close the Harvard Business School (February 23, 2009)”, “The Court Of Truth And Justice (CTJ) (August 29, 2016)”, “On The Digital Revolution (March 22, 2010)”, “‘Adjunktification’ In The S.I.C. (Schooling Industrial Complex) (March 13, 2017)”, “Schooling The Apparatchiks For the Kleptocrats (December 7, 2015)”, “On Merit and the Meritocracy (January 11, 2010)”, “Clinton, Inc., Trump, Inc., Bush, Inc., Kennedy, Inc., O’Bama, Inc. (October 24, 2016)”, “MPP / MPA:  Are They Really Masters? (November 13, 2017)” and “Johnnie Bolton:  The Triumph Of the Chickenhawks And Neo-Cons.  Join Fellow Patriots For The ‘April 14 Rally’ And The Memorial Day ‘March For America’.  Oh, And Happy April Fool’s Day. (April 2, 2018)”.]

Bumper stickers of the week:

I support the “III Act”

Think big, think long

The Illegitimate Institution Unpacks After “Beach Week”:  Time To Start Packin’ The Court (October 1, 2018)

Posted in Courage, Courts, First Monday In October, Supreme Court on October 1, 2018 by e-commentary.org

. . .

K          “There is a cancer in the current Court.”

J          “The current Court is the cancer.”

. . .

K          “I do believe Dr. Blasey Ford.  I do not believe Brett Kavanaugh.”

J          “I do not believe Brett Kavanaugh.  I do believe Dr. Blasey Ford.”

. . .

K          “Thomas has confirmed the claims of those who claimed that he is unqualified.  He doubled down on the incompetence out of spite.”

J          “Gorsuch is occupying the ‘Stolen Seat’ without any reservation or compunction.”

K          “And the ‘American Psycho’ is set to assume the third illegitimate seat.”

. . .

K          “Why not?  The argument is that if you do it, they will do it.”

J          “So be it.  Something must be done.  Do it.  Pack it.”

. . .

K          “Only a few Americans realize that the appointments are not for life, they are ‘during good behaviour.’  They are behaving badly.  They need to go.  The Democrats need to present a coherent vision and future and then start impeachment hearings against the illegitimate Justices.”

J          “But the Democrats are weak, effete, feckless and craven.”

. . .

J          “Kavanaugh is ethically obligated to recuse himself from any case involving the Democratic Party, the ACLU, any left wing group broadly defined, voting cases, partisan gerrymandering cases, claims involving Presidential immunity and authority, the Environmental Protection Agency and global climate change, immigration, and other issues.”

K          “Or Roberts must preclude him from participating and deciding.  Someone needs to keep track of any cases in which he participates and later when the forces of light are in control to issue an omnibus order holding all of the holdings void ab initio.”

J          “Each failure to recuse himself is a separate impeachable offense.”

. . .

J          “He observed that if you gave some credence to packing the Court, you would not get into Yale.”

K          “That’s the heart of the problem.  That’s the game in America.  Kavanaugh was angry and frustrated that the ordinary people did not understand that because he got into Yale, all his sins and transgressions were forgiven.”

J          “Secular redemption in today’s America.  Perhaps part of a comprehensive solution is to close Yale and to close Harvard, convert the dorms into low income housing and use the funds to create a great educational institution open to individuals with intellect and integrity and the oft-forgotten . . . character.”

J          “And closed to those who do not have character.”

. . .

K          “Any chance that the Senate will do right?”

J          “Not.  A.  Chance.”

. . .

[See the e-commentary at “Is Kavanaugh Qualified? (July 30, 2018)”, “KavaNaugh(t): Naught.  Oh, and Happy Women’s Equality Day! (August 27, 2018)” and the e-commentary under the Categories “First Monday In October” and the “Supreme Court”.]

Bumper stickers of the week: 

Kavanaugh Calendar:  June 5, 1982:  “Achievment Tests”

B     E     A     C     H          W     E     E     K

Five Red Robes Trump Four Blue Robes

My child is a courageous law professor

The Truth has no statute of limitations

My daughter is a courageous Alaska lawyer

“What goes around, comes around”  Brett Kavanaugh

Suing Law Schools; Suing Gun Makers.  Oh, And Happy Law Day! (April 30, 2018)

Posted in Courts, Education, Guns, Kleptocracy, MICAC, Schooling on April 30, 2018 by e-commentary.org

. . .

K          “It is about time.  Manufacturers are legally culpable for defective products that proximately cause damage.  Some folks are talking about holding gun manufacturers liable.  Now is the time to hold law schools liable for their defective products.”

J          “It is long overdue.  Law schools are profit-maximizing institutions pursuing a longer term financial strategy that drives, directs and dictates admission decisions.  They have enough information over the decades to calculate the rate of return in lucre and luster for each applicant over his or her lifetime and admit and deny accordingly.  And the statute of limitations does not expire until the lawyer expires, so there is still time.”

K          “When you study the process carefully, you realize that character is immaterial or maybe even an impediment to being admitted.  That is a business decision.  However, that is a business decision that should be challengeable in court.  A citizen should be able to sue Harvard Law School for any of Michael Pompeo’s abominations and Yale Law School for any of Johnnie Bolton’s desecrations and other criminal activities.”

J          “Absolutely.  Law Schools are full sustaining members of the MICAC (Military Industrial Congressional Academic Complex).  Moving down the path toward the adoption of the rule of law in the U.S. requires a first step.  Let’s take a first step by requiring law schools to adhere to the rule of law.”

K          “The problem is finding an honest court in America.  We need to support the creation of the Court Of Truth And Justice (CTJ).”

. . .

K          “Gun manufacturers are liable for defective guns.  A gun can maim or kill a few bodies; a lawyer can maim or kill the body politic.” 

. . .

J          “If they blow up the entire world to smithereens, the damages are going to get way, way up there.”

. . .

[See the e-commentary at “Johnnie Bolton:  The Triumph Of The Chickenhawks And Neo-Cons.  Join Fellow Patriots For The “April 14 Rally” And The Memorial Day “March For America”.  Oh, And Happy April Fool’s Day! (April 2, 2018)”, “Schooling The Apparatchiks For The Kleptocrats (December 7, 2015)”, “Clinton, Inc., Trump, Inc., Bush, Inc., Kennedy, Inc., O’Bama, Inc. (October 24, 2016)”, “The Court Of Truth And Justice (CTJ) (August 29, 2016)”, “Assigning Blame:  The Lawyers: 50 Percent; The Non-Lawyer Public: 50 Percent; The Judges: 100 Percent (December 3, 2012)” and “Perjury, the American Way (February 20, 2006)”.]

Bumper stickers of the week:

We live in a country with many, many, many rules and many, many, many laws, but we do not live in a country that believes in or adheres to the rule of law.

May 1 – Law Day

The Power Of Small Thinking (March 12, 2018)

Posted in Courts, Education, Judges, Peoplocene Age, Plastic, Schooling, Society on March 12, 2018 by e-commentary.org

. . .

K          “Decade in and decade out in every venue from academia to the courts, when big thinking confronts the typical small thinking individual or institution, small thinking almost always emerges.”

J          “C’est la life.  If there is no money in big thinking and buckets of money in small thinking, then small thinking prevails.  It is the first law of societal thermo-economico-dynamics.”

. . .

[Plastics continue to plague the planet.  See “Saving the albatross: ‘The war is against plastic and they are casualties on the frontline’” in “The Guardian” by Anna Turns dated March 12, 2018.  Time to think big.  See the e-commentary at “Living In The “Peoplocene Age”.  The Inconvenient Truth:  Renewable Energy Is Not Sustainable; The Population Must Be Restrainable.  (December 12, 2016)”.]

[See the e-commentary at “On Merit and the Meritocracy (January 11, 2010)”, “On Standards & Quality (July 20, 2015)”, “‘You Can’t Be Smarter’ (August 10, 2015)”, “Federal Judges:  Institutionalized Bullying (September 18, 2017)”, “Arctic High School Court (May 23, 2016)”, “The Ninth Circuit:  Two-Tiered ‘Just-Us’ Review (February 13, 2017)”, “The Paradox Of The Republican Federal Judge:  Republican Federal Judge Syndrome (September 23, 2013)”, “MPP / MPA:   Are They Really Masters?  (November 13, 2107)”, “So Many Words, So Few Ideas (September 21, 2009)”, “Skip the Nobel in Economics? (October 5, 2009)” and “How To Run A Newspaper (February 8, 2016)”.)

Bumper stickers of the week:

BIG THINKING in -> small thinking individual or institution -> small thinking out

e-commentary:  BTI -> BTO (BTU?)

Competency is so overrated.

“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”  Upton Sinclair

“When small men begin to cast big shadows, it mean that the sun is about to set.”  Lin Yutang

Think big, think long.