. . .
K “They are Swedes. They are rumored to be smart and level-headed.”
J “There is always that bottom half of the class lurking out there.”
. . .
K “The selection of Bernanke is cruel, perverse, twisted and offensive. He has done more to destroy opportunity for the average person and to shovel wealth to the already wealthy Kleptocrats than just about anyone else in recent history other than possibly Greenspan. We are suffering and will continue to suffer from his decisions and indecision.”
J “Bernanke committed economic crimes against the public good. A person who commits economic crimes against the public good is a criminal.”
. . .
K “One of the recipients of the purported Peace Prize is allegedly investigating Russian war crimes but not Ukrainian/NATO/US/UK war crimes. They should be investigating war crimes. Partisan activities should not be rewarded. So many of the purported NGOs [Non-Governmental Organizations] are fronts working hand in glove with governments.”
J “They may need to take sides. Sometimes, sides need to be taken.”
. . .
K “You know full well that when they took the fingerprints on the Nord Stream pipeline sabotage caper, they made a perfect match with . . . Samuel, Uncle. You know full well that when they did a DNA swab test on the Nord Stream pipeline sabotage caper, they made a perfect match with . . . Samuel, Uncle. And now the Swedes are blocking a complete investigation of an international act of terrorism.”
J “They may need to take sides. Sometimes, sides need to be taken.”
. . .
K “These are the good folks who conceived and crafted the legendary Volvo 122S and the celebrated SAAB 90 series.”
J “These are the good folks at the Gransfors Bruk and S.A. Wetterlings and Hults Bruk facilities who hand forge scientific works of art that work artfully in hand. At least we agree that the dullards at the Sveriges Riksbank, the Swedish Central Bank, are not the sharpest splitting mauls in the wood bunk. Their failure, however, is not one of intellect but of judgement, character and integrity.”
. . .
[See the optimistic and hopeful e-commentary at Bernanke 2.0 (August 31, 2009) and a more disquieting analysis of his comments and tenure at the Fed. at Economics And Finance: Girls v. Boys (June 4, 2018) including commentary on economic and financial commentators including Yves Smith.]
Bumper sticker of the week:
“In the surreal economy, the Nobel Prize committee showed either they don’t read this Daily (no!), or if they do, they do the opposite. After all, they just gave the Prize in Economics (jointly) to former Fed Chair Ben Bernanke.
Yes, Economics isn’t a real Noble Prize. Yes, there have been lots of previous stupid winners of even the real Prizes:
For Peace to Aung San Suu Kyi, for being pro-democracy – who then looked the other way over a genocide; to the EU, for being the EU; to Barack Obama, for something – who then carried out drone strikes on weddings, etc.; to Henry Kissinger – for blowing up South-East Asia, etc.
For Literature to Peter Handke – despite genocide denial (again); to Bob Dylan – for singing; to Mario Vargas Llosa – for being political in a way the committee liked; and never to Tolstoy while we was still alive.
For Economics to Friedman – for monetarism, just before it was tried and failed, and as he backed the dictator Pinochet in Chile; to Nordhaus – for saying if climate change gets too bad, we can spend more time indoors and GDP will be OK; to Krugman – for saying free trade always ends up with the best of all possible outcomes in the best of all possible worlds.
However, to give a Nobel to Ben “Sub-prime is contained”/“high levels of private debt do not matter”/“banks intermediate between savers and borrowers”/“zero rates and QE” Bernanke for providing “a foundation for our modern understanding of why banks are needed, why they’re vulnerable, and what to do about it” — just as central banks try to undo the post-2008 policy error, and perhaps the post-1980 financialisation and zombification of the economy to boot — is either a slap in the face (“You might reshape the global economy, but you aren’t going to get a prize from us!”) or shows economics, or the Nobel committee, or both are past saving.
Putting it more succinctly, Matt Taibbi tweeted: “Giving Ben Bernanke the Nobel Prize in Economics may be the drunkest decision of all time.” Amen, Matt, Amen. And cheers to the Nobel Prize team.
. . .
Don’t worry though – we have Ben Bernanke and other Nobel prize-winners to guide us through.”
Seventh Annual Pushitzer Prize In Commentary For 2022 (May 9, 2022)
Posted in Economics, Journalism, Pushitzer Prize In Commentary on May 9, 2022 by e-commentary.org. . .
“The envelope please. . . . This year’s Pushitzer Prize in Commentary is awarded to . . . Yves Smith (Susan Webber) with Naked Capitalism . . . for stirring the pot, asking hard questions, demanding answers, rejecting lies, spotlighting uncomfortable truths, comforting the afflicted and afflicting the comfortable. And being a journalist. And choreographing a collective of journalists who comment with insight and integrity on finance, economics, politics, power and life.”
. . .
[See the e-commentary on the ongoing international crime at The Persecution Of Assange And The Feckless MSM (September 21, 2020).]
[See the e-commentary on the Commentary Award at Sixth Annual Pushitzer Prize In Commentary For 2021 (June 7, 2021), Fifth Annual Pushitzer Prize In Commentary For 2020 (May 4, 2020), Fourth Annual Pushitzer Prize In Commentary For 2019 (April 15, 2019), Third Annual Pushitzer Prize In Commentary For 2018 (April 16, 2018), Second Annual Pushitzer Prize In Commentary For 2017 (April 10, 2017), First Annual Pushitzer Prize In Commentary For 2016 (April 18, 2016), Pulitzers Are Pro-War? Pressing The Pushitzers (April 22, 2013) and Economics And Finance: Girls v. Boys (June 4, 2018).]
[Please send nominations for the Pushitzer Prize in Commentary for 2023 and a supporting letter by January 21, 2023 to e-ssay@gci.net and send the entry fee to your favorite charity.]
Bumper stickers of the week:
Naked Capitalism: Fearless commentary on finance, economics, politics and power
Make journalism great again
Make journalism journalism again
“The purpose of arresting Julian Assange is to send a message to the people, especially journalists, to be quiet and don’t get out of line. If we, the people, allow the government to control us through fear, we are no longer free, we are no longer America.” Tulsi Gabbard
Leave a comment »