Archive for the First Amendment Category

First Monday In October:  Dos-à-dos (October 7, 2024)

Posted in First Amendment, First Monday In October, Middle East, Supreme Court, War on October 7, 2024 by e-commentary.org

. . .

K          “The putative civil libertarians (Kagan, Sotomayor and Jackson) have taken off their masks and revealed themselves to be . . . authoritarians and totalitarians.  My new super hero is . . . Sam, the civil libertarian.  What a long strange trip this life is turning out to be.”

J          “They are still concerned with the public good.  The public good sometimes requires one to look at and to and for the good of the public generally.”

. . .

K          “One of my projects still in draft form compares the Trump appointees and the Biden appointees to the federal district courts and the federal appellate courts.  Establishing a metric is problematic and vexing.  At this time, however, the Trump appointees have done much more to protect civil liberties than the Biden appointees.  In the last two Presidential election cycles, I broke the tie for the Presidential candidates based on my concern that the Democrats need to hold the Senate to control the judiciary.  That has changed.”  

J          “Trump has appointed lawyers who are loyal and obedient foot soldiers to him.  That does not promote the public good.”

. . .

K          “The most pressing legal concern today is to return to protecting the natural rights that preexist the adoption of the Bill of Rights and were until recently protected by the Bill of Rights.”

J          “With reasonable restrictions.”

. . .

K          “The word ‘Lawfare’ is a portmanteau of ‘law’ and ‘warfare’.  Portmanteaus are usually clever; ‘Lawfare’ is not.  Weaponizing the judiciary will haunt the legal system for decades.  The spiritual mitochondria of good faith and fair dealing is being eviscerated by judges cooperating with prosecutors to get politicians and people.”

. .  .

[See the e-commentary at Murthy v. Missouri:  AMA v. AAPS; Flaccid Amendment v. First Amendment.  The Speakers’ Corner And The Public Square. (March 18, 2024) and “Supreme Court backs Biden administration in social media dispute with red states”  Biden 1; People 0.  Oh, And Happy Canada Day! (July 1, 2024) and graduation advice.]

Bumper stickers of the week:

“What a long strange trip it’s been.”  Grateful Dead

Make Lawfare Imprudent Again

From Jill Stein:

Today, October 7th 2024, marks one year since the Hamas attack on Israel that many consider to have sparked Israel’s US-backed genocidal campaign against Gaza that is now exploding into a regional war.  But history did not begin on October 7th, 2023.

To understand the current situation, we must look back at least as far as 1948 to the Nakba, the brutal mass expulsion of indigenous Palestinians from their homes by Zionist paramilitaries and the newly formed state of Israel.  While the world has been watching in horror for the past year as this genocidal rampage has cut short hundreds of thousands of innocent lives, that one year was preceded by generations of violence, occupation, displacement, dispossession, apartheid, and ethnic cleansing.

While we abhor violence, we must understand that settler colonialism, occupation, genocide, and all forms of oppression have always provoked resistance.  If we merely condemned violence “on all sides” without first acknowledging the underlying conditions of oppression and doing everything we can to rectify those conditions, we would not only fail to address the root causes of the problem, but would risk becoming complicit in injustice by drawing a false equivalency between oppressor and oppressed.  As Desmond Tutu observed, “if you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.”

One of history’s greatest nonviolent change makers, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., identified the “great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom” as “the white moderate who is more devoted to ‘order’ than to justice” and “who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice”.  For too long, the US government has supported Israel’s version of “order” and “peace” that demands the systematic subjugation of Palestinians to violent injustice.  But whenever people are denied their human rights, resistance is inevitable.  Even President Kennedy recognized this with his statement that “those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.”

Dr. King also recognized the hypocrisy and uselessness of condemning the violence of the oppressed without first addressing the violence of oppression: “I knew that I could never again raise my voice against the violence of the oppressed in the ghettos without having first spoken clearly to the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today – my own government.”  The US government is fully complicit in the violence that Israel has inflicted on the Palestinians and others, after supplying Israel with over one hundred fifty billion dollars in military aid and shielding Israel from accountability to the international community for its long history of defying international law.  For Americans to condemn Palestinian resistance while our own government actively oppresses the Palestinian people would be neither just nor conducive to peace.

The events of October 7th, 2023 have been weaponized to justify the genocide of Palestinians.  Yet it has become clear that official accounts of October 7th have not only been divorced from the historical context, but factually distorted to serve the agenda of the Zionist Israeli government.  As one example, Australia’s ABC News reported in September that Israeli forces apparently applied the “Hannibal Directive” on October 7th, killing an untold number of their own citizens in attempts to prevent them from being taken hostage.  The official discourse on hostages has also been extremely one-sided, rarely if ever mentioning that thousands of Palestinians are held prisoner by Israel without charge.  From the “Hannibal Directive” killings to Netanyahu’s disregard for the families of Israeli hostages to Israel’s expansion of the war far beyond Gaza, it’s clear that the Israeli government has not acted out of concern for hostages, but has only used those concerns as justification to launch a preconceived agenda of conquest and genocide.

In just the last few weeks, the situation has gotten even worse.  In a massive escalation of its genocidal war on Gaza, Israel has invaded Lebanon.  Shortly thereafter, Iran launched a barrage of missiles at Tel Aviv in response to Israel’s attacks on Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, Palestine, and Iran itself, raising fears of an ever-expanding war in the Middle East that could even spark World War III, nuclear war, or both.

If he wanted to, President Biden could stop this war with one phone call to the Israeli prime minister as Ronald Reagan did in 1982.  Israel’s war machine is completely dependent on US taxpayer-supplied weapons, money, military and diplomatic support.  But instead the Biden-Harris administration is complicit in Netanyahu’s plans to expand this horrific war.  A recent Politico article titled “US officials quietly backed Israel’s push against Hezbollah” revealed that top Biden advisors actually encouraged Israel to invade Lebanon – despite the Democrats’ claims that Kamala Harris is “working tirelessly for a ceasefire”.

We do not consent to be dragged into World War III by Netanyahu to support his genocidal land grab in Palestine, Lebanon, and beyond.  By allowing Netanyahu to essentially dictate US foreign policy, Biden and Harris have abdicated the responsibility of their office.

As President, the first thing I will do is make the phone call to stop this madness at once and fix the crisis at its source – by ceasing all support to Israel until it ends its genocide in Gaza and agrees to negotiate a settlement for Palestine and the region consistent with international law and the rulings of the International Court of Justice.  The US, as the primary backer of Netanyahu’s military campaigns, holds the power to end his assault on Gaza and bring him to account.  This is not a matter of diplomacy but of the US electorate exercising its responsibility by voting for leaders with the political will to act.  As voters in the most powerful nation on Earth, we bear a unique obligation to hold our government and its allies accountable.

By holding Israel accountable, the US can rejoin the international community, from which we have become increasingly isolated due to our government’s unconditional support for Israel’s defiance of international law.  When the United Nations considered membership for Palestine this year, 143 nations voted in favor and only 9 against, including the US and Israel.  But the US has consistently used its veto power to shield Israel from accountability, undermining any credibility our nation has to speak on issues of international law and human rights.

As a Jew who grew up just after the Holocaust, with relatives who fled pogroms and a grandfather named Israel, I take “never again” seriously.  And that means never again for anyone.  In just the last year, I have met thousands of people from all walks of life, including Muslims, Jews, Christians, Palestinians, Israelis, Arabs, and many others from many ethnic, religious and spiritual backgrounds.  And I can say with certainty from my personal experience that peace and friendship are possible.  We can put an end to war, genocide, and generations of oppression, and start a new path to a world of peace, justice, and human rights for all.

In solidarity and gratitude,

Jill Stein

“Rage Against The War Machine”:  Saturday Noon DC; “Rescue The Republic:  Join The Resistance”: Sunday Noon DC (September 23, 2024)

Posted in Censorship, First Amendment, Immigration, Justice, Medicine, MIC, MICAC, Wall Street, War on September 23, 2024 by e-commentary.org

“Why is our Republic worth preserving? WHAT IS THE WEST?”

“At its heart, it is an agreement to distribute opportunity as widely as possible. Today, the foundation that makes up the West is under attack.  This moment demands radical change and requires liberals, conservatives, and independents of every color and creed to unify to rescue the West.”

Rescue The Republic – Join The Resistance will kick off at 12 pm on Sunday, September 29

“The stage will be located northeast of the WWII Memorial (east of 17th Street) and open viewing will extend all the way to the Washington Monument.  The program will consist of a mix of musical artists, comedians and thought leaders who alternate in a fast-paced program.”

THE 8 PILLARS:

War is always the last resort v. Military Industrial Complex

Sanctify/recodify informed consent v. Medical Industrial Complex

Banish state media control, surveillance and propaganda v. Censorship Industrial Complex

Enact a rational border policy v. Immigration Industrial Complex

End Lawfare and abuse of the judicial system v. Injustice Industrial Complex

Secure monetary freedom v. Finance Industrial Complex

Restore family sovereignty v. Developmental Industrial Complex

Return to truth-seeking and open dialogue v. Academic Industrial Complex

Bumper stickers of the week:

Keep it simple; avoid complexity

Rage Against the War Machine on Saturday; Rescue The Republic:  Join The Resistance on Sunday.

Zuckerberg: “I did exactly what the Supreme Court refused to condemn or even criticize.  And got away with it!” (September 9, 2024)

Posted in Censorship, Facebook, First Amendment on September 9, 2024 by e-commentary.org

. . .

K          “That is what I wrote in an e-mail to a friend.  That is not exactly what he said.  Zuckerberg admitted that his company succumbed to ‘repeated’ pressure by the Biden-Harris administration to censor posts.  His actions amount to actionable election interference that no one in power will act on.”

J          “A little friendly censorship of misinformation is a good thing.”

K          “The government is never going to condemn its own interference.  The Supreme Court failed.  I have no doubt that we will all suffer in the intermediate run.”

. . .

[See “Why Did Zuckerberg Choose Now to Confess?” by Jeffrey A. Tucker in “Brownstone Institute” dated August 30, 2024 and “Facebook: A Seneca Collapse Ahead?  Why I’m Gradually Quitting the Beast” by Ugo Bardi in “senecaeffect.substack.com” dated August 12, 2024.]

[See the e-commentary at Murthy v. Missouri:  AMA v. AAPS; Flaccid Amendment v. First Amendment.  The Speakers’ Corner And The Public Square. (March 18, 2024) and “Supreme Court backs Biden administration in social media dispute with red states”  Biden 1; People 0.  Oh, And Happy Canada Day! (July 1, 2024).]

Bumper sticker of the week:

Propaganda is not just about creating fake news.  Propaganda is also about hiding real news.

“Supreme Court backs Biden administration in social media dispute with red states”  Biden 1; People 0.  Oh, And Happy Canada Day! (July 1, 2024)

Posted in First Amendment, Free Speech, Supreme Court on July 1, 2024 by e-commentary.org

. . .

K          “The headline above an Associated Press article astutely sums up the score.  Law in America is a game and a sport with winners and losers.  The decisions should be printed and debated on the Sports Page.  However, there is no justice.”

J          “Not allowing them to make their argument was callow.” 

. . .

K          “The idea that even an ordinary person off the street does not have standing to defend the most fundamental Constitutional right is obscene.  They were advocating for free speech and were not even allowed to speak.  I know obscenity when I see it.”

J          “Time to appoint non-lawyers to the courts.  Lawyers are not capable of handling the task.  A new team is our only salvation.”

. . .

K          “I suspect they were discreetly reminded that they should not forget who they are dealing with.  Any one of the more than half dozen vaunted persuasion vectors alone could have been persuasive.” 

. . .

[See the e-commentary at Murthy v. Missouri:  AMA v. AAPS; Flaccid Amendment v. First Amendment.  The Speakers’ Corner And The Public Square. (March 18, 2024).]

Bumper stickers of the week:

“[O]ne of the most important free speech cases to reach this Court in years.”

There was “more than sufficient” evidence that Jill Hines, one of the plaintiffs, had standing to sue “and consequently, we are obligated to tackle the free speech issue that the case presents.” 

“The Court, however, shirks that duty and thus permits the successful campaign of coercion in this case to stand as an attractive model for future officials who want to control what the people say, hear, and think.” 

“The Government’s pressure tactics, which included threats of adverse regulatory action, cannot be dismissed as mere persuasion.”

“This ruling effectively grants the government a free pass to continue its campaign of suppression, threatening the foundational principles of free expression.”

Justice Samuel Alito

Assange.  Free. (June 24, 2024)

Posted in First Amendment, Free Speech, Journalism on June 24, 2024 by e-commentary.org

. . .

[See the article “JULIAN ASSANGE IS FINALLY FREE” by Joe Lauria in Consortium News dated June 24, 2024.]

[See the e-commentary at Hero or Traitor? (June 10, 2013), November 23, 1963; Three Score Years Later (November 27, 2023) and The Persecution Of Assange And The Feckless MSM (September 21, 2020) and also type “Assange” in the search box.]

Bumper sticker of the week:

Free.  Assange.  Free.

Murthy v. Missouri:  AMA v. AAPS; Flaccid Amendment v. First Amendment.  The Speakers’ Corner And The Public Square. (March 18, 2024)

Posted in Censorship, First Amendment, Journalism, Supreme Court on March 18, 2024 by e-commentary.org

. . .

J          “The American Medical Association (AMA) provides the soundest diagnosis and prescription.”

K          “The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) provides the soundest diagnosis and prescription.”

. . .

J          “In brief, the AMA encourages the dissemination of accurate information and enforces the censorship of misinformation and disinformation.”

K          “In brief, the AAPS promotes the First Amendment and protects free speech.”

. . .

[See the discussion “AMA? BITFD!” by Ben Hunt in “Epsilon Theory” dated November 24, 2020.  (“I thought I was immune to being shocked by corporate mendacity and greed.  Then I started digging into the AMA.”)  See “Technocensorship: When Corporations Serve As a Front for Government Censors” by John Whitehead, the recipient of the Second Annual Noble Prize In Jurisprudence (October 16, 2017), and Nisha Whitehead at The Rutherford Institute dated February 27, 2024.  Their amicus brief is more poetry than prosaic turgid legal prose.  (“The facts of this case are positively Orwellian.”)]

[See the e-commentary at Graduation Advice:  Find The First Amendment (May 15, 2023).]

Bumper stickers of the week:

The Supreme Court hears oral argument in Murthy v. Missouri this morning.

Questions presented: (1) Whether respondents have Article III standing; (2) Whether the government’s challenged conduct transformed private social-media companies’ content-moderation decisions into state action and violated respondents’ First Amendment rights; and (3) Whether the terms and breadth of the preliminary injunction are proper.

The Westminster Declaration:  The Right To Free Speech; The Right To Information.  Oh, And Happy Halloween!  It Is Spooky Out There. (October 30, 2023)

Posted in Censorship, First Amendment on October 30, 2023 by e-commentary.org

. . .

K          “If I prayed, my prayers would be answered.  I sought to circulate a petition protecting one’s right to petition for redress, yet no one was interested.”

J          “You know my concern.  There is too much misinformation.  Information must be mediated by someone responsible.  You know my other concern.  No individual or institution is responsible enough to mediate.”

K          “The marketplace of ideas can handle it.”

. . .    

K          “Matt Taibbi, Michael Shellenberger and Bari Weiss, the three recipients of the Eighth Annual Pushitzer Prize In Commentary For 2023 (May 8, 2023), are on board.  Julian Assange, the recipient of the Third Annual “Cameo In Courage” Award For 2018 (April 9, 2018) and the Fourth Annual “Cameo In Courage” Award For 2019 (April 8, 2019), is on board.  Edward Snowden, the recipient of the First Annual “Cameo In Courage” Award For 2016 (May 9, 2016), is on board.  There are still courageous folks on this planet willing to take a stand.” 

. . .

K          “Last week, Consortium News filed a lawsuit in federal court to challenge Newsguard and the U.S. government for violating the First Amendment and defaming the authors.  Newguard has been acting on behalf of the U.S. Government to censor information.”

. . .

K          “Tomorrow on the morn of Halloween in Lindke v. Freed, the Supreme Court is addressing the following question:  ‘Courts have increasingly been called upon to determine whether a public official who selectively blocks access to his or her social media account has engaged in state action subject to constitutional scrutiny.  To answer that question, most circuits consider a broad range of factors, including the account’s appearance and purpose.  But in the decision below, the court of appeals rejected the relevance of any consideration other than whether the official was performing a “duty of his office” or invoking the “authority of his office.”  App. 5a.’”

J          “The answer will be long, too.”

. . .

J          “Misinformation concerns me.”

. . . 

[See “US Government & NewsGuard Sued by Consortium News” in “Consortium News” dated October 23, 2023.]

Bumper stickers of the week:

The Westminster Declaration

“Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”  Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Knowledge is power.  No, knowledge is not power.  But ignorance is powerlessness.

“Scientia potentia est”  Sir Francis Bacon / Thomas Hobbs

“If we don’t believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don’t believe in it at all.”  Noam Chomsky

“If liberty means anything at all it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.”  George Orwell

“The first human who hurled an insult instead of a stone was the founder of civilization.”  Sigmund Freud

United States of America V. Thomas Jefferson: The Transcript (September 18, 2023)

Posted in First Amendment, Free Speech, Revolution on September 18, 2023 by e-commentary.org

. . .

G         “Mr. Jefferson, would you look at Exhibit 1?  Would you identify that document?”

J          “Yes.  Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of the Declaration of Independence.”

G         “Did you write the document?”

J          “Yes.  Most of it.”

G         “Does it reflect your thoughts?”

J          “Yes.  The provisions I wrote reflect my thoughts and beliefs and convictions.”

G         “You realize in this proceeding that you may be convicted for your convictions?”

J          “Yes.”

G         “Would you look at the section highlighted in the middle of the page and read it?”

J          “Yes.  ‘But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.’  That sentence?” 

G         “Did you write that statement?”

J          “Yes.  I did.  My friends John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Roger Sherman, Robert Livingston and I discussed some of the phrases and the cadence and the placement of provisions in the document.”

G         “Your Co-Defendants?”

J          “I would say co-authors.  They deserve credit.  They have not gotten enough credit for their suggestions and editing.”

G         “Did you say:  ‘it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government’?” 

J          “Yes.  I did.  Under those stated circumstances, it is the right and the duty of the citizen to take that action.  A right is something that usually protects against an action of or statement by a person.  A duty is something that a citizen must do.  Under those stated circumstances, the citizen has both a right to act and a duty to act.”

G         “‘to throw off such Government’ is how you say it?”

J          “Yes.  That is how I say it.  ‘After a long train of abuses and usurpations.’  Yes.  Absolutely.  Those sentiments are part of the core assumptions and foundation of the United States of America.  Someone in the future will discover something likely to be described as ‘DNA’; these sentiments are part of our ‘DNA’.”

. . .

[See the e-commentary at On Revolution (March 15, 2010).]

Bumper stickers of the week:

“The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.”  Thomas Jefferson

“Every generation needs a new revolution.”  Thomas Jefferson ???

“I hold it that a little rebellion, now and then, is a good thing.”  Thomas Jefferson

“But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”  Thomas Jefferson

Graduation Advice:  Find The First Amendment (May 15, 2023)

Posted in First Amendment, Graduation Advice on May 15, 2023 by e-commentary.org

.  .  .

K          “Find the First Amendment.  Don’t quit until you find it.  It may be hidden under a rock.  If you quit and don’t find it, we may get stoned for what we say.”

.  .  .

K          “Ladies and gentlemen of the class of ’23 . . . find the First Amendment. . . .  If I could offer you only one tip for the future . . . find the First Amendment.  You have been studying and partying and extracurricularing at a frantic and frenetic pace.  Now is the time to . . . find the First Amendment.  The assault on the First Amendment is coordinated and unrelenting by just about every large public and private and quasi public/private institution in America.  We all love it in theory but have a hard time applying it in practice, at least to others.  Sentiments such as the First Amendment and Due Process require a level of emotional intelligence and maturity sorely lacking today particularly among the parvenu PMC caste who were expensively school and yet lightly educated. As you join the company of educated men and women, find the First Amendment.”

. . .

K          “Wear sunscreen.  Wear hearing protection; listen attentively.  Wear chainsaw safety chaps; cut with care.  Eat dessert: First.  Learn to tie a bowline (and a bow tie).  Stop, pause, think.  Eschew fear.  Transcend:  Maintain FL 44; Make A Few Discrete Dives And Diversions To TPA (Traffic Pattern Altitude).  And find the First Amendment.”

. . .

[See “High Court Declines Arkansas Case on Boycotting Israel” by Marjorie Cohn in “Consortium News” dated March 2, 2023 discussing the one case more than any other case that should have been reviewed and reversed by the Court (the “Illegitimate Institution”?) without delay or hesitation.  See the e-commentary at Senate Repeals Constitution.  Oh, And Happy Presidents’ Day! (February 18, 2019) and House [Also] Repeals Constitution.  Oh, And Happy Civic Holiday In Canada! (August 5, 2019) and the entire Boycott Category.  For good measure, see “Biden’s DOJ Indicts Four Americans for Their Political Views on Russia” by Dave DeCamp in www.antiwar.com dated April 19, 2023.]

[See the original “Sunscreen Column”, the Wikipedia article “Wear Sunscreen” and listen to “Everbody’s Free (To Wear Sunscreen)”.]

[See the e-commentary at The Möbius Loop Of Stupidity, Dishonesty, Hypocrisy, Incompetence, Indifference, Arrogance, . . .  Oh, And Happy Thanksgiving! (November 25, 2019), Graduation Advice:  Transcend:  Maintain FL 44; Make A Few Discrete Dives And Diversions To TPA (Traffic Pattern Altitude) (May 16, 2022), Graduation Advice: Eschew Fear (May 10, 2021), Graduation Advice:  Stop, Pause, Think (May 18, 2020), Graduation Advice:  Learn To Tie a Bowline (And A Bow Tie) (May 13, 2019), Graduation Advice:  Eat Dessert.  First. (May 14, 2018), Graduation Advice:  Wear Chainsaw Safety Chaps; Cut With Care (May 15, 2017), Graduation Advice:  Wear Hearing Protection; Listen Attentively (May 16, 2016) and the advice to youth at Go East, Young Person (August 25, 2014).] 

Bumper stickers of the week:

Wear sunscreen.  Wear hearing protection; listen attentively.  Wear chainsaw safety chaps; cut with care.  Eat dessert:  First.  Learn to tie a bowline (and a bow tie).  Stop, pause, think.  Eschew fear.  Transcend:  Maintain FL 44; Make A Few Discrete Dives And Diversions To TPA (Traffic Pattern Altitude).  And find the First Amendment.

Find the First Amendment

Flee the Mobius Loop

Make 2024 the “Year Of The First Amendment”

“Here in America we are descended in blood and in spirit from revolutionists and rebels – men and women who dare to dissent from accepted doctrine.  As their heirs, may we never confuse honest dissent with disloyal subversion.”  Dwight D. Eisenhower.

“I disapprove of what you say, but [I] will defend to the death your right to say it.”  Voltaire

Eighth Annual Pushitzer Prize In Commentary For 2023 (May 8, 2023)

Posted in Awards / Incentives, First Amendment, Journalism, Pushitzer Prize In Commentary on May 8, 2023 by e-commentary.org

. . .

            “The envelope please.  . . .  This year’s Pushitzer Prize in Commentary is awarded to . . . Matt Taibbi, Michael Shellenberger and Bari Weiss . . . for their work exposing the alliance between Twitter and other Big Tech Behemoths and Big Government that coordinates efforts to suppress and censor free speech.  For their exposure of 51 foreign policy types who knowingly and actively interfered in the 2020 election in support of Biden.  And for their efforts stirring the pot, asking hard questions, demanding answers, rejecting lies, spotlighting uncomfortable truths, comforting the afflicted and afflicting the comfortable.  And being journalists.”

. . .

[See “Post-Decency Politics:  House Democrats Use Hearing to Attack Both Free Speech and a Free Press” by Jonathan Turley in “JonathanTurley.org” dated March 13, 2023 and “Why Do Mainstream Democrats Hate Matt Taibbi?” by Yves Smith, the recipient of the Seventh Annual Pushitzer Prize In Commentary For 2022 (May 9, 2022), in “Naked Capitalism” reprinting “Democrats vs. Democrats – One of Them Will Lose” by Thomas Neuburger in “neuburger.substack.com” dated April 6, 2023.]

[See the blatant dishonesty, hypocrisy and cowardice of the corporate stenographers who masquerade as journalists in America and cover for each other but disregard one of the world’s most courageous journalists in the proclamation “Journalism Organizations Call On Administration To Prioritize Reporters Taken Hostage [But Not Real Reporters Such As Julian]” dated April 14, 2023.  And not a word about Gonzalo Lira today.]

[See the e-commentary on the ongoing international crime at The Persecution Of Assange And The Feckless MSM (September 21, 2020).]

[See the e-commentary on the Commentary Award and previous recipients at Seventh Annual Pushitzer Prize In Commentary For 2022 (May 9, 2022), Sixth Annual Pushitzer Prize In Commentary For 2021 (June 7, 2021), Fifth Annual Pushitzer Prize In Commentary For 2020 (May 4, 2020), Fourth Annual Pushitzer Prize In Commentary For 2019 (April 15, 2019), Third Annual Pushitzer Prize In Commentary For 2018 (April 16, 2018), Second Annual Pushitzer Prize In Commentary For 2017 (April 10, 2017), First Annual Pushitzer Prize In Commentary For 2016 (April 18, 2016) and Pulitzers Are Pro-War?  Pressing The Pushitzers (April 22, 2013).]

[Please send your nomination for the Pushitzer Prize in Commentary for 2024 and a supporting letter by January 21, 2024 to e-ssay@gci.net and send the entry fee to your favorite charity.]

Bumper stickers of the week:

Make journalism great again

Make journalism journalism again

Knowledge is not power, but ignorance is powerless

“First they came for the journalists.  We don’t know what happened after that.”

“All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force.”  George Orwell