Archive for the Congress Category

Joe Miller, Alaska and America: Now What? (September 27, 2010)

Posted in Congress, Earmarks, Political Parties on September 27, 2010 by e-commentary.org

. . .

C     “What if the Blue States accept Alaska’s recent offer, albeit tendered by a minority of mobilized voters, and cease providing massive subsidies, transfers, earmarks and grants to Alaska?”

S     “De-commission the Denali Commission, a federally-funded agency developing Alaska infrastructure?  Do away with SBA (Small Business Administration) Section 8(a) that provides preferences for Natives and veterans in federal contracting?  Provision the Native Hospitals exclusively with ANCSA (Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act) Section 7(i) profits?  Ban federally-funded home care nurses from entering tax-assisted Alaska homes spewing Fox propaganda on state-subsidized televisions?  Support the Alaska Financial Independence Bill:  “No federal funds shall be authorized, appropriated or expended for the use or benefit of the state of Alaska until all of the funds in the Alaska Permanent Fund have been exhausted for such purposes”?”

C     “On the national level, divert funds from the Department of Education to the Department of Ignorance?  Move from Social Security to Social Insecurity?”

S     “Do Alaskans want outside interests such as the Koch brothers of California to determine elections the way the Seattle fishing syndicate dominated Alaska life before statehood?  What about the growing influence of the Alaskan Taliban – the radical reactionary religious right?  Joe Miller is a certified nut case, but do those in Alaska like him because he is like them?”

C     “Is he the plaid Sarah Plain/Palin?  Can Lisa Murkowski mount a successful write-in campaign?  And who is Scott McAdams?”

S     “The far, far right versus the far right?”

C     “The election is less about electing persons than it is about defining the Alaskan people.”

S     “These elections are less about electing persons than they are about defining the American people.”

. . .

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/04/the_red_state_ripoff.html

Bumper stickers of the week:

Alaska Politics:  Louisiana with fjords, New Jersey without the charm, Uganda with receding glaciers

Alaska Politics:  Chinatown North

Alaska:  Building Bridges to Nowhere

My wheel dog is smarter than your lead dog.

What occurs in Alaska [the Pacific Northwet?] after two days of rain?  A sunny Monday.

On a Prius:

After two days rain

What occurs in Alaska?

A sunny Monday

On Entitlements (July 19, 2010)

Posted in Congress, Entitlements, Politics, Society on July 19, 2010 by e-commentary.org

. . .

G          “There was a time when a citizen possessed a few cherished inalienable rights and a variety of revocable privileges.  Along came this hybrid thing called an ‘entitlement’ that soon morphed into a quasi-right.  Now too many entitlements are regarded as inalienable birthrights.”

H          “There isn’t anyone in America who does not feel entitled to an easy life without effort or sacrifice.”

G          “Except some individuals in the Middle West of America.  They do not believe they are entitled to everything.  However, they do not show up on the radar because they live in an area known as the ‘flyover states.’  They are not counted and thus don’t count, although they can and do count.”

H          “The entitlement mentality infects each and every class, race, region, religion and age group in the country.  Except some individuals in the Middle West, you contend.”

G          “Americans believe that they are entitled not to die.  Repudiating one’s mortality, now that is an entitlement.  The future will be rude for most Americans.  Except some individuals in the Middle West who are better prepared to weather the coming economic tornado.  The courts first created due process rights and then the Democratic and Republican Parties embraced and expanded them with as much zeal as their constituents.”

H          “Registered Republicans pitch a hissy fit about the guv-mint, yet they demand the same or more entitlements as others.  No one is immune.”

G          “Except some individuals you know where.  Entitlements are now at the core and heart of the American DNA.”

H          “The future will be a taxing emotional transition for an unprepared people.”

. . .

Bumper stickers of the week:

The guv-mint should keep its hands off my Social Security.

Je suis entitled.

I am owed.

I am entitled.

The “Contract with America”; The Congressional Reform Act of 2010 (March 29, 2010)

Posted in Conflicts of Interest, Congress, Health Care, Pensions, Term Limits on March 29, 2010 by e-commentary.org

. . .

“They need to be treated like us; we need to be treated like them.  It’s that simple and that difficult.  The only mechanism to deal with the conflict of interest between elected officials and ordinary citizens is to put them in the same bed and on the same boat.  That is the real ‘Contract with America.’”

. . .

Bumper sticker of the week:

1.         Term Limits.  12 years total pursuant to one of the three options below:

A.              Two six-year Senate terms.

B.              Six two-year House terms.

C.              One six-year Senate term and three two-year House terms.

2.         No Tenure / No Pension.  A Congressperson collects a salary while in office and receives no pay when he or she is out of office.

3.         Congresspersons, past, present and future, participate in Social Security.  All funds in the Congressional retirement fund transfer to and all future funds are deposited with the Social Security system immediately.  Congress participates with the American people.

4.         Congresspersons can fund their own retirement plan just as all Americans do.

5.         Congresspersons will no longer vote themselves a pay raise.  Congressional pay will rise by the lower of CPI or 3%.

6.         Congresspersons lose their current health care system and participate in the same health care system as the American people.

7.         Congress must equally abide by all laws they impose on the American people without exception.

8.         All contracts with past and present Congresspersons are void effective 1/1/11 absent some compelling reason.  The American people did not make these contracts with Congresspersons.  Congresspersons concocted these contracts for themselves.

(For some variations on these big bumper ideas, see the “e-ssays” dated March 5, 2007 titled “Congress Should Increase Congressional and Judicial Pay; Shareholders Should Reduce CEO/CFO/COO Pay,” dated May 14, 2007 titled “Term Limits,” and dated February 25, 2008 titled “’American Medicine’ Not ‘Socialized Medicine.’”)

Commodities Futures / Future Commodities (March 8, 2010)

Posted in Congress, Economics, Society, Water on March 8, 2010 by e-commentary.org

“. . .  In developments at the bourse, the ongoing drought in Europe is blamed for the price of water rising $2.13 to close at $84.29 a barrel for glacial blocks for delivery in May.  . . .  At the close of trading today, the average price of a share of a United States Senator rose seven percent, matching analysts’ expectations.  . . .  On rumors that the United States may impose export restrictions on kidneys harvested from minors without their consent, a kidney climbed $7000 (delivery FOB).  . . .  And the price of oil again was crude.  . . .”

Bumper sticker of the week:

Futures Sticker Shock

The Double Ought (00) “Decadent Decade” (January 4, 2010)

Posted in Afghanistan, Bailout/Bribe, Bernanke, Bush, China, Congress, Debt/Deficits, Economics, Federal Reserve, Foreign Policy, Greenspan, Health Care, Housing, Iraq, O'Bama, Presidency, Supreme Court on January 4, 2010 by e-commentary.org

1999:  No major wars yet percolating problems in a dozen venues; budget deficit surplus of about 236 billion dollars, although Bush inherited about a 5.7 Trillion dollar National Debt; and a boiling but unstable and slowly cooling economy.

The decade that threatened to come in with a bang sauntered in with only the traditional fire works.  Y2K may have been such an epic universal non-event because everyone realized that it was a real deadline that could neither be disregarded nor overlooked.  It was not Y2.001K.  Problems were timely addressed in a timely manner in time.  That was not the attitude for the remainder of the decade.

An outwardly non-descript and largely unknown bumbling scion who had been shepherded by others for their own purposes through an uneventful life was appointed by the Supreme Court to run things.  The ship of state sailed uneventfully for a time.  A written invitation to impending disaster delivered to and disregarded by the White House in August, 2001 was honored in September, 2001 by a quartet of airships.  The course of action was simple.  Know who we are and remain faithful to who we are.  Stay our course.  Redouble our vigilance and redouble it again (and redouble it one more time).  Too many in power and influence in the country lost their heads.  Leadership was non-existent.

A perfect storm.  An obscenely incompetent President, a flagitious and arrogant vice-President, a smug, bungling and petulant Secretary of War/Defense (Rumsfeld), hamstrung Secretaries of State (Powell and Rice), a mendacious Secretary of the Treasury in the second term (Paulson), a marginal Attorney General (Gonzales) and their ilk were not the Dream Team.  The damage they inflicted in the decade will take decades to repair.

Bush proclaimed that WeMaD (Weapons of Mass Destruction) and almost everyone joined in the madness.  No one ever made a compelling case for the invasion of Iraq.  The national press (WP, NYT and so many others) yearned for war, any war, just give us a war with photo ops and film at eleven.  The major television networks (NBC, CBS, ABC, Faux) were thrilled and went wild with glee.  It was a time, the only time, to watch their coverage non-stop to bear witness in real time to the folly and the madness.  The few dissenting voices (Warren Strobel and Jonathan Landay with Knight Ridder’s Washington Bureau, Terry Gross and guests with NPR/Fresh Air, Walter Pincus with the WP and a few dozen other courageous individuals) did not reach a wide audience.  They were voices in the darkness.  The Iraq quagmire is the greatest foreign policy blunder in American history.

Deficit spending and economic looting became the national pastimes.  Almost everyone involved in directing and controlling the economy (Reagan, Gramm and Rubin in earlier decades with the assistance of Bush, Greenspan, Paulson, C. Cox, Geithner, Summers and others in this decade) almost without exception (Brooksley Born and a few others) were committed to undermining the American economy at every opportunity for the benefit of a few.  One must concede that they succeeded handsomely.  Although they are domestic economic terrorists, their activities never became the subject of the vaunted “war on terror.”  No one ever made a compelling case for the bribery and bailout of Wall Street.  Bernanke* remains the enigma, the outsider and the ultimate insider, who did not recognize what was obvious before and after he became Chairman in February, 2006 and disregarded the advice of his colleague Edward Gramlich.

The first African-Irish-American was elected President.  There were a few things they did not tell him before he got elected that he learned quickly after he got elected.  He re-nominated Bernanke* to run the Federal Reserve which may be the only option given the limited economic talent in America.  His appointments to date are adequate, yet the administration is still seeking traction and direction.  Health care is becoming his domestic economic quagmire.  Although it is not really the job of the government to provide jobs and/or homes, the populace wants a job to go to during the day and a house to come home to at night.

About the House.  And the Senate.  Congress could be declared a natural disaster area.  The Republicans are useless, the Democrats are not particularly useful.  Forty-five percent of Americans respond to and are motivated by fear and loathing; the Republicans know and stoke their base.  The Republicans may make great strides in the November elections.  The party committed to destroying government may again be given that opportunity.

The nine members of the Supreme Court are more myopic and narrow-minded than just about any other Court in the history of the Republic.  The Court sports two religions (with one exception), two schools (with one exception), and two (mas o menos) schools of thought (with a few exceptions), yet it has two women, too.  The war at the Court and for the Court continues.  O’Bama may have an impact, although the impact of the economy on O’Bama’s future will greatly impact his impact on the Supreme Court.

The profit-maximizing universities in America should be part of the solution, but they are part of the problem; they may be more accurately described as part of the process and the processing.  They recruit, train and drill the next McNamaras and Rumsfelds.  To their credit, they adhere to a thirty-year business plan rather than the three-month strategy pursued by other businesses.

The information made public in the National Intelligence Reports over the decade patiently and exhaustively chronicles the decline of America’s role in the world after six decades of preeminence.  America has done much wrong during that time, yet America has done far, far, far more good, often with resentment and usually without thanks.  On balance, everyone is better off with the United States as the dominant superpower.  This is China’s century.

Now:  Multiple wars, battles, skirmishes and police actions with two major foreign base camps (Iraq and Afghanistan); massive and growing deficits and about a 12.3 Trillion dollar National Debt; zero private-sector employment gain and zero economic gain for the average family over the decade; and no industry to inflate other than the federal government industrial complex.

[See the “e-ssays” dated Jan. 5, 2009 titled “The Millennium to Date”; dated October 6, 2008 titled “A Bleak Day:  The Trillion Dollar Tragedy”; dated September 29, 2008 titled “Futile Efforts”; dated May 4, 2009 titled “Picking the Supreme Beings”; dated May 14, 2007 titled “Term Limits”; and dated Jan. 30, 2006 titled “Greenspan’s Legacy:  Apres moi, Le Meltdown.”]

Bumper stickers of the week:

The Recession is Over.

The Recession is Over; Let the Depression Begin

Halcyon Ano Nuevo

The Millennium To Date (January 5, 2009)

Posted in Congress, Presidency, Supreme Court on January 5, 2009 by e-commentary.org

When presented with a defining challenge this Millennium, each branch of government failed.

2000 – Judicial.  Eight years ago, the Supreme Court in Bush v. Gore decided that it not the voters will decide who is to be President.  The Supreme Court elected to appoint the President and preempt the voters.  The court issued a special decision to benefit one person.  An unprecedented decision has set a bad precedent.  The composition and ideology of the Supreme Court is even worse today.

2001 – 2003 (and continuing) – Executive.  Bush and Cheney came into office committed to invading Iraq.  After being warned in a daily briefing in August, 2001 that “Bin Laden Determined To Strike In U.S.,” no one thought to interpret the report to suggest that Bin Laden was determined to strike in U.S.  Bush left for Crawford to clear bush and brush.  When 9/11 occurred, the pretext for invasion arose even though neither Iraq nor any Iraqis were involved in the planning, implementation or funding of the 9/11 attacks.  His decision to invade lit a fuse that will be seen to have triggered the start of World War III.  Now Bush/Cheney are seeking to rewrite history to suggest that the intelligence that they and others actively distorted was provided by others.  For its part, Congress cravenly went along enough to provide Bush with political cover.

2007 – Legislative.  The Bailout/Bribe Bill was predictable and predicted.  Scare the public and you can get anything.  Paulson appointed himself King, raided the fisc, and gave money to fiends and former colleagues.  The Debt is exacerbating intermediate and long term economic problems in ways that the business and economic commentators do not seem to understand.  Bush more than any other person is responsible for the “Bush/Greenspan/Gramm Depression.”  Nonetheless, Congress has been a co-conspirator and an economic enabler.

One hopes that Clio is taking careful notes.

Bumper sticker of the week:

Blind faith in bad leaders is not patriotism.

Futile Efforts (September 29, 2008)

Posted in Bailout/Bribe, Congress, Economics on September 29, 2008 by e-commentary.org

HSB

Washington, D.C. 20510

Senator _________:

Enough.  This bailout/handout is obscene.

Risk is the handmaiden of reward.  Success and failure are American.  Privatizing success and socializing failure are unwise if not criminal.  And no way to run a Republic.

Why are we as a country creating a dictator/czar who is not subject to congressional oversight or judicial review to decide how he will run the country?  Paulson was previously the Chairman and CEO of Goldman Sachs.  The wolf is in charge of the hen house.  He has done nothing for years.

This problem has been with us for many years.  Why get excited now?  We as a country got all excited and passed the PATRIOT Act, went to war with Iraq, etc.  Now is the time to reflect.

Reflect on the three articles in today’s NYT:  Kristol, Krugman and Cohen.  Cohen’s article addresses the international dimension.  The rest of the world does not care about the developments in the USA and is not going to do anything to help.  Let’s not be so concerned about the rest of the world on this issue at this time.

If we as a country are going to nationalize the industries, why not nationalize the industries rather than just the losses?

If we reject the bailout, there will be some inconveniences and costs, yet life will go on.  We will get up in the morning, put on our socks and go on with life.

If the legislation is passed, there is no rescinding it according to its term.  The long-term negative consequences of a bailout/handout to the taxpayer and the country are incomprehensible.

It is time to say No! to this travesty.

This legislation is unwise and imprudent.

Over the last few days, I have been surprised at how united _______ are on this issue.  Across the political spectrum, there is disgust and outrage.

It is time to reflect.

Sincerely,

_______________

****************************************************************************************************

RHOB

Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congressperson ______:

The politicians must quit digging.  “When you are in a hole, quit digging.”  Now is the time to reflect and think clearly about this “Economic 9/11” that has been foisted on the Republic by Wall Street with the involvement of far too many equally greedy American citizens.

The bailout bill is a travesty that will create more intermediate-term problems without solving any current ones.  The only way to fund the bailout will be to print money or borrow it from the Chinese and other countries.  Either source of funds is fraught with even worse economic consequences in the next six months.

If ma and pa store owner in [local towns] cannot get credit, then establish a program to allow direct short-term emergency loans from the government, perhaps the SBA, to meet their credit needs.  If someone cannot get a loan to purchase a vehicle, establish a program to provide a loan and take a security interest in the vehicle.  The New York banks have all the money in the world and still refuse to loan it.  Why reward that behavior by giving them more money?  Why push on a string?

The Senate is often described as the more deliberative body.  It is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the banking industry, lock, stock and sinker.

Bernanke showed tremendous promise, but he has failed.  Paulson is part of the problem and should not be vested with the powers of a czar/dictator/central planner so that he can benefit his friends and former colleagues.

The economic and business press is behind this bill in part because, with a few notable exceptions, they have so miserably misunderstood and misrepresented the problem for years.

This is a time for courage.  Vote against this version and make a public statement that the “leadership” must make another effort to provide a sound bill or the negative economic consequences will be their responsibility.  Let the House shine.

Regards,

________________________

Bumper sticker of the week:

Otter:  “I think this situation absolutely requires a really futile and stupid gesture be done on somebody’s part.”

Bluto:  “We’re just the guys to do it.”

“Animal House” movie (1978).

Pensions and Other Entitlements: Pt. 2 (April 28, 2008)

Posted in Bankruptcy, Congress, Constitution, Courts, Law, Pensions, Social Security on April 28, 2008 by e-commentary.org

Constitutional law in America is neither consistent nor coherent.  The United States Bankruptcy Courts may be the only forum to adjust pensions and other obligations.  A business can file a petition pursuant to the United States Bankruptcy Code in Title 11 and apply Section 365 to reject pension and other obligations.  Many corporations have rejected pension and other obligations for decades and in recent publicized cases.  Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code allows a municipality to file a petition in bankruptcy and resort to the relief in Section 365.  Orange County, California did it in 1994; Desert Hot Springs, California in 2001; Vallejo, California may do it in 2008; watch San Diego in the next few years.

A separate state of the union is not now afforded an opportunity to file a petition under the Bankruptcy Code even if it is not able to afford to pay its bills.  A new chapter of the Bankruptcy Code, Chapter 15, may need to be added allowing a state to utilize the provisions of Section 365.  The big public policy development will come when everyone realizes that another new chapter of the Bankruptcy Code, perhaps Chapter 17, may need to be added to allow the United States government itself to file a petition under the Bankruptcy Code to utilize the provisions of Section 365.  [See the e-ssay dated January 17, 2005 entitled “America the Bankrupt:  Economics 210 in the Land of the Freeway and the Home of the Brave”.]

Using the Bankruptcy Code is problematic at best.  In effect, the Congress (a legislative body) would pass legislation to allow a Bankruptcy Court (the judicial branch) to make a decision that Congress may be prevented from making itself by another twig of the judicial branch.  Section 365 is binary and only allows a debtor to accept or reject a contract; there is no ready provision to allow a Bankruptcy Court to accept sixty percent (60%) of the pension and other obligations.  Where to file the petition is not clear, the Southern District of New York; the Northern District of Alaska, or elsewhere?  The Bankruptcy Judge has less discretion under the Bankruptcy Code to recognize the decision of the debtor to accept or reject, although he or she may be unwilling to recognize a decision that could threaten his or her pension.

The unfunded and unfounded promises we have made to each other will stagger those who were never consulted.  Or even born.  All government entities in the intermediate term will need to dispense with or limit pension and other obligations.  Addressing the matter in the Bankruptcy Code and in the Bankruptcy Courts is cumbersome and incomplete, yet the approach more easily overcomes the constitutional infirmities that other courts have mistakenly imposed.  At core, as noted previously, the rejection really is not a rejection of pension obligations, it is a refusal to accept obligations the Younger Generation never agreed to undertake nor can reasonably be expected to perform.

Some say: “If we were just informed that our pension and other obligations could disappear or be reduced, we could modify our behavior and decisions now.”  What if someone said: “Your pension and other obligations could disappear or be reduced.”  Despite their protestations, the populace, even when informed, likely will not modify its behavior and decisions.  The answers admittedly are not easy.

Bumper sticker of the week:

There Is No Such Thing As A Free Snack.

Deficits Do Matter (January 7, 2008)

Posted in Bush, Congress, Debt/Deficits on January 7, 2008 by e-commentary.org

There may be no greater lie than the one advanced by Reagan, Bush, Cheney and others that budget deficits do not matter.  Budget deficits do matter.  Budget deficits are a form of taxation.  Budget deficits are a tax imposed on the next generation.  The Cheney-Bush team and their ilk have raised taxes via deficit spending more than all other previous administrations in American history.  The Reagan budgets produced the second largest deficits as a result of “tax increases.”  About seventy percent (70%) of the Nine Trillion Two Hundred Billion Dollar + (9,200,000,000,000.00 +) Debt is attributable to Reagan, Bush, Bush and Cheney.  An irresponsible Congress constituted of Democrats and Republicans and an irresponsible White House populated by Democrats and Republicans contributed.

A temporary budget deficit followed by a balanced budget or a surplus would not matter in the intermediate run.  However, a deficit (“little d”) that is followed by a deficit followed by a deficit followed by a deficit followed by a deficit followed by a deficit has created and is creating a catastrophic national Debt (“Big D”).  Imagine spending $10,000 a month for twelve (12) months.  The $10,000 expenditure is a “rate” of spending and is described as the “deficit.”  At the end of the year, the total amount of $120,000 and accumulated interest is described as the “Debt.”  deficit + deficit + deficit + deficit + deficit + deficit ……. = Debt.  The Debt is now more than nine decimal two (9.2) trillion dollars.   $9,200,000,000,000.00.

Bumper stickers of the week:

deficits do matter;
Debt really does matter

Debt Is Deferred Taxation

Debt is Debilitating

Attention:  deficit Disorder

Attention:  Debt Disorder

Trade Deficits Matter Also

Household Debt Matters Also

Congress Is Out Of Control (June 26, 2006)

Posted in Congress, Economics on June 26, 2006 by e-commentary.org

Congress refuses to address the most pressing problems today–a bloated and growing federal budget and the Iraqi Quagmire–and instead is trying to find more ways for the government to interfere in our lives.  Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid exceed 40 percent of federal spending and will increase with each birthday of the Baby Boomers.  Another looming problem–unfunded or inadequately funded pensions–will require increased funding of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation or another government agency with a similar mission in the near future.  The Iraqi Quagmire has now slogged on longer that America’s involvement in World War II.  Continued involvement does nothing to protect American interests.  The National Guards of the states need to be redeployed to their home bases to assist in protecting citizens from the ravages of hurricanes, tornados, wild fires, earthquakes and rain damage.  These issues do not trouble Congress.  Rather, Congress wants to define marriage, yet marriage must be defined by consenting adults.  Congress wants to ban flag burning, yet free speech is an individual right.  The Fall elections offer a chance to adjust priorities.