. . .
K “The ‘D’ division of the War and Wall Street Party foisted a candidate who passionately believes in pursuing war and protecting Wall Street. The ‘R’ division of the W.W. Party forwarded a candidate who may not be as passionate about pursuing war and protecting Wall Street but then with him who the devil knows. He is a nativistic, nihilistic and narcissistic nut job.”
J “Add Nazistic to that list. And misogynistic, racistic, and xenophobic.”
. . .
K “He is also supported by the Middle Finger Party. Some of the more reflective people who support The Donald are thoroughly disgusted with a government and economic system that is corrupt to the core.”
J “The Middle Finger Party is not the Middle Way Party.”
K “I am confident that the only profitable party – The War and Wall Street Party – is the Wrong Way Party.”
. . .
K “Her entourage includes punks, thugs, grifters, drifters, shop lifters, lifers, ex-cons, cons, future cons, neo-cons, neo-libs, criminals, war criminals, war mongers, inside traders, outside traders, traitors, terrorists, ne’er–do–wells and cattle rustlers (hereinafter “Kennedy School/Goldman Sachs” archetypes).”
J “His gang includes punks, thugs, grifters, drifters, shop lifters, lifers, ex-cons, cons, future cons, neo-cons, neo-libs, criminals, war criminals, war mongers, inside traders, outside traders, traitors, terrorists, ne’er–do–wells and cattle rustlers (hereinafter “Wharton School/Fly By Night REIT” archetypes). But we do not even know who he will put on the public payroll.”
. . .
K “Clinton is a globalist and Trump is a nationalist.”
J “So that means that Clinton will usher in a World War and Trump will usher in a Civil War.”
K “They do not call it the Peace and Wall Street Party.”
. . .
J “I concede that Clinton privately supports and will sign the Trans-Pacific Partnership because it benefits the international corporations that fund and bribe Clinton, Inc.”
K “Trump’s challenges to the international trade agreements, if genuine, are challenging because truly free trade can provide mutual benefits to many but not all. He cannot reject all of the treaties carte blanche with executive orders.”
. . .
K “Three score years ago, Adlai Stevenson ran against Dwight Eisenhower. Statesmen both. The nation could not go wrong with either candidate.”
J “In two generations, a ‘win-win’ option then is replaced with a ‘lose-lose’ dilemma now. That must be what they call progress.”
. . .
J “Vote against Trump. And for Clinton.”
K “In the final analysis, it all comes down to the Supreme Court. Vote for the crook over the crazy man. With extraordinary reluctance. Then despair.”
J “It has gotten old.”
. . .
J “Vote.”
K “Vote.”
. . .
[See the e-commentary at “Better the crook we know than the crazy man we don’t? Applying The Conservative Tie Breaker. (June 20, 2016)”, “The ‘War and Wall [Street] Party’ On The War Path (February 1, 2016)”, “The Donald: The Consummate Republican. Sort Of. (March 28, 2016)”, “On Male ‘Diss’ ‘Coarse’ And Electioneering (March 21, 2016)”, “A Second Party: Trump or Sanders? (March 14, 2015)”, “Trans-Pacific Partnership / United Nations Convention On The Law Of The Sea (May 25, 2015)” and “The First Look At The ‘Second Political Party’ (January 3, 2011).”)
Bumper stickers of the week:
Vote.
Vote Clinton. With extraordinary reluctance. Then despair.
e-commentary 