. . .
J “Not as carefully yet.”
K “But that does not seem to be an impediment for most people.”
. . .
J “Others claim to have mined the Report for nuggets. What is in the Report and whether it is incriminating or exonerating turns on who one turns to for direction and indoctrination.”
K “The Report could be one thousand empty white pages allowing one thousand empty-headed babblers of all political planks to fill in the blanks.”
J “Or one thousand redacted black pages that could be divined by one thousand self-appointed secular priests and priestesses.”
. . .
K “I never shared your faith in Mueller. Anyone concerned about Truth cannot not be disappointed by the longevity of the investigation and the superficiality of the Report that is available for review to date.”
J “Further proof that America does not produce individuals who can serve competently as lawyers or judges or special counsel.”
K “But it has produced a generation of journalists who cannot even ask insightful questions.”
J “They parry and riposte, but do not read Parry or reason.”
. . .
K “Reminds me of the tony cocktail party at Tony’s a half dozen years ago when Assange’s picture exploded on a television monitor/mirror parked haphazardly off in a corner. Everyone ceased barking mid-sentence and simultaneously branded him either a ‘Traitor’ or a ‘Hero’ before inhaling another suspire and exhaling further unsolicited opinions.”
J “The more things change.”
. . .
K “With all the hired help doing all that investigating all that time, they should have been able to confirm the findings of William Binney and the ‘Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS)’ that the documents were downloaded not hacked which further supports those who contend that he is a hero.”
J “Assange or Binney? . . . Or Assange and Binney? I now understand that my man Mueller never even consulted with either of them. That is another major failing.”
. . .
K “Assange should receive a pardon and a Pulitzer.”
J “Pardons are given to those in the Club, but not to great and courageous citizens. Pulitzers are given to those in the Club, but not to great and courageous journalists.”
. . .
K “So the Russian involvement in the election was incidental and insignificant particularly in comparison to the Dark Money and other nation-state actors such as Israel that played major roles with no public scrutiny or even mention.”
J “Agree.”
K “Trumpi may have had some limited communication but no active and on-going collusion which is not surprising because Trumpi just does not play well with others.”
J “Agree.”
K “Trumpi is engaged in on-going racketeering, money laundering, tax evasion, obstruction of justice and jay walking.”
J “Agree. However, I still don’t trust the Russians. They are up to no good. And I never trusted Trumpi. He is down to much bad.”
. . .
[See the article titled “VIPS Fault Mueller Probe, Criticize Refusal to Interview Assange” in “Consortium News” crafted by the “Steering Group of the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS)” dated April 16, 2019 and the article titled “ROBERT PARRY: All Investigative Journalists Do What Julian Assange Did” in “Consortium News” by Robert Parry first published on December 16, 2010.]
[See the e-commentary at “Hero or Traitor? (June 10, 2013)”, “Russian Interference; Russian Collusion. Epilogue (March 25, 2019)” and “Russian Interference; Russian Collusion (February 26, 2018)” for the earlier conversation.]
Bumper stickers of the week:
The Robert Rorschach Report
Most investigative journalists today are neither investigators nor journalists
Happy Earth Day!
Fifth Annual Pushitzer Prize In Commentary For 2020 (May 4, 2020)
Posted in Awards / Incentives, Journalism, Press/Media, Pulitzer, Pushitzer, Pushitzer Prize In Commentary on May 4, 2020 by e-commentary.org[Google continues to block access to https://e-commentary.org/ with no justification or recourse.]
. . .
“The envelope please. . . . This year’s Pushitzer Prize in Commentary is awarded to . . . Whitney Webb . . . for stirring the pot, asking hard questions, demanding answers, rejecting lies, spotlighting uncomfortable truths, comforting the afflicted and afflicting the comfortable. And being a journalist and a patriot for the Planet.”
. . .
[See “Dr. Fauci Backed Controversial Wuhan Lab With Millions Of U.S. Dollars For Risky Coronavirus Research” in “Newsweek” dated April 28, 2020 by Rusty Guterl.]
[See the e-commentary at “Fourth Annual Pushitzer Prize In Commentary For 2019 (April 15, 2019)”, “Third Annual Pushitzer Prize In Commentary For 2018 (April 16, 2018)”, “Second Annual Pushitzer Prize In Commentary For 2017 (April 10, 2017)”, “First Annual Pushitzer Prize In Commentary For 2016 (April 18, 2016)” and “Pulitzers Are Pro-War? Pressing The Pushitzers (April 22, 2013)”. See the e-ssay written fifteen years ago titled “Ohio – Not Forgettin’ Ohio; The Battleground State Battles On (May 2, 2005)” on the fiftieth anniversary.”]
[Please send nominations for the Pushitzer Prize in Commentary for 2021 and a supporting letter by January 24, 2021 to e-ssay@gci.net and send the entry fee to your favorite charity.]
. . .
Bumper stickers of the week:
“Show me the incentive and I will show you the outcome.” Charlie Munger
For good and honest stuff
Dissent is patriotic
Plant a garden
Poor journalism
Need integrity, courage
Need to save Planet
Leave a comment »