. . .
L “At core, the Supreme Court really confessed that all nine of them in fact have cell phones, too.”
M “Thank goodness that the Founding Fathers anticipated the emergence of cell phones. That seems to be what animated Scalia, Alito and Thomas.”
. . .
L “If, pray tell, a cop detained a Justice of the Supreme Court, the computer check of the vehicle license plate or a quick review of his or her Supreme Court identification card would summon an immediate apology from the police for the delay and inconvenience.”
M “A cop would see the Supreme Court parking sticker on the bumper and arrest his or her activities.”
L “Supreme Court Justices are immune from prosecution.”
M “Yet their kids have cell phones and may not be afforded the same immunity.”
. . .
L “Roberts’ opinion is an insightful commentary on the ubiquity of the cell phone and its pervasiveness in our lives. The ‘smarty pants phones’ are the repositories of our mind and soul.”
M “The kids in particular are transfixed by these fixtures that could be affixed to them with pop rivets.”
. . .
M “You could craft a novel using just cell phone records and, for good measure, credit and debit card statements. Grocery receipts, book purchases and movie rentals are a telescope and microscope into one’s internal hard drive. The reader would need to participate actively in reading between the lines, discerning the interstices and supplementing the silences, yet the effort would be rewarded.”
L “I stumbled on my January, 2011 credit card statement and relived the previous month just reviewing line item entries. Who, what, when, where and, with some imagination, why.”
M “There are no secrets today.”
. . .
L “The Court and public officials should error, if it is an error, on the side of privacy.”
M “A warrant really is not much to ask.”
L “Nine to nothing is something.”
. . .
Bumper stickers of the week:
Get a warrant, please.
Justice Roberts knows more about cell phone telephony than your honor student . . . or your dog.
e-commentary 